Search Climate Insights Directory

The document assesses the Tanzanian parliamentary system, analyzing its structure, the balance of power between the executive and legislature, and the effectiveness of its engagement with civil society. It highlights a significant disparity between the perceptions of parliamentarians and civil society organizations regarding the transparency and adequacy of legislative processes, particularly concerning the time allowed for public consultation on bills and the scrutiny of international loans. While formal mechanisms for oversight exist, such as standing committees and question-and-answer sessions, the paper identifies constraints including party supremacy, limited resources for MPs, and the use of 'certificates of urgency' to bypass public publication of bills.

The document reports on a survey of farmers in the Baltic Sea region, finding that while most are aware of water quality issues and accept responsibility for pollution, their priorities differ by country. Farmers in Estonia and Poland identify manure storage as a primary pollution source and request more support for modernization, whereas Swedish farmers do not view it as a priority. The brief highlights a divide between farmers who see themselves as 'land managers' providing public goods and those focused primarily on production. It recommends shifting toward outcome-based approaches, positive communication, and adaptive bureaucracy to improve the effectiveness of water protection management.

The document compiles qualitative feedback from scientists at various U.S. federal agencies and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) on the state of climate research integrity. The responses highlight systemic concerns regarding political interference, funding cuts, and restrictions on public communication, while some scientists express dissenting views on the extent of these issues or the validity of certain climate models.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) conducted a survey of 1,586 EPA scientists, finding that 60 percent experienced political interference in the five years preceding the report. The study details how political appointees and the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) manipulated scientific findings on issues like climate change and mercury pollution. It also highlights barriers to free communication, such as fear of retaliation and restrictions on media contact, and notes a decline in job satisfaction and resources. The report recommends elevating the EPA to a cabinet-level agency, strengthening whistleblower protections, and increasing transparency in regulatory decision-making.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) and the Government Accountability Project (GAP) found widespread political interference in U.S. federal climate science, including pressure to alter findings and restrict communication. Survey data shows that 58% of federal climate scientists experienced interference in the five years prior to the report, contrasting sharply with the experience of non-federal scientists at NCAR. The report highlights barriers to media access, declining inflation-adjusted funding since the mid-1990s, and poor morale, recommending reforms to ensure scientific openness and the 'right of last review' for scientists.

The document describes a 'system-wide epidemic' of political interference in federal climate science, where 150 out of 279 surveyed scientists reported at least 435 occurrences of interference over five years. Examples include the watering down of NASA press releases, the cancellation of NOAA media plans, and the use of 'minders' to monitor scientist interviews. While 88% of respondents believe the quality of federal climate science remains strong, they report a 'chilling effect' and warn that funding cuts to long-term monitoring threaten future research. The Union of Concerned Scientists recommends strengthening whistleblower protections and ensuring scientists have the final review of communications regarding their findings.

The document consists of qualitative feedback from 502 FDA scientists across various centers. The responses overwhelmingly highlight systemic issues including political interference from the executive and legislative branches, the perceived conflict of interest created by industry user fees (PDUFA/MDUFMA), chronic underfunding, and a management culture that prioritizes political agendas and industry interests over scientific evidence and public health.

The paper examines 27 PPCFIs representing US$41.3 billion in capitalization, finding that limited private sector co-investment is driven by small deal pipelines, inadequate scale, and rigid institutional mandates. It recommends that donor governments foster climate-friendly markets, increase private sector awareness, and streamline access processes to better mobilize the trillions of dollars required for green infrastructure in developing countries.

The report analyses survey data from 74 respondents in Cape Town regarding their use of boreholes and views on groundwater management. Key findings indicate that while many citizens use or consider boreholes to reduce reliance on municipal water and mitigate drought risks, there is strong support for regulating groundwater to prevent over-abstraction. The document also identifies a significant gap in the availability of local groundwater quality data and recommends the creation of a public information dashboard, preferably via a web page, to provide data on water quality, abstraction amounts, and borehole registration.