Search Climate Insights Directory

The document describes Exxon's legal strategy of initiating discovery processes in Texas against public officials and attorneys from California and Massachusetts. The author characterizes these actions as intimidation tactics designed to disrupt lawsuits filed by California jurisdictions against fossil fuel producers for their role in the climate crisis. It highlights previous failed attempts by Exxon to claim a conspiracy involving NGOs and prosecutors in New York and Massachusetts, and argues that the company is attempting to use municipal bond disclosures to allege fraud against the cities suing it.

ClientEarth argues that the draft guidance from ECHA and EFSA exceeds its legal mandate by lowering the level of environmental and health protection established by EU co-legislators. The organization specifically criticizes the requirement for a detailed understanding of the mode of action as a pre-condition for EDC identification, asserting that this creates an excessive evidentiary burden that risks 'false negatives' and contradicts the precautionary principle. ClientEarth also contends that the guidance illegally attempts to extend its scope beyond pesticides and biocides and fails to sufficiently mandate the inclusion of all available relevant scientific data, including novel test methods.

The document expresses absolute concern over the European Union Election Observation Mission's (EU EOM) acceptance of the 2017 Honduran general election results, which saw Juan Orlando Hernández proclaimed president. The authors argue that the EU EOM minimized electoral irregularities, such as the suspension of results disclosure on November 29, and ignored the brutal state repression of peaceful protesters, which resulted in over 20 deaths and hundreds of injuries. The statement highlights the illegality of Hernández's candidacy and the harassment of environmental and human rights defenders, including Berta Zuñiga of COPINH. It concludes by demanding a final report from the EU EOM that acknowledges the government's violent strategies, recognizes electoral fraud, and calls for the protection of human rights and environmental defenders.

Friends of the Earth Europe and Latin America and Caribbean denounce the European Union Election Observation Mission (EU EOM) for legitimizing the 2017 Honduran general election results. The organization argues that the EU EOM minimized electoral irregularities and ignored the brutal state repression of peaceful protesters. They contend that President Juan Orlando Hernández's candidacy was unconstitutional and call for the EU EOM's final report to document human rights violations and the role of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) in the alleged fraud.

The document expresses deep concern that the EU Election Observation Mission (EU EOM) legitimized Juan Orlando Hernández as the winner of the 2017 Honduran elections. The authors argue that the EU EOM minimized election day irregularities and ignored the 'brutal state repression' against citizens protesting electoral fraud. They highlight that Hernández's candidacy was 'illegal and unconstitutional' due to a ban on re-election and report that state violence during protests resulted in more than 20 deaths and hundreds of injuries. The statement calls for a final EU EOM report that acknowledges the violent repression, recognizes electoral irregularities—such as the suspension of results dissemination on 29 November—and refuses to recognize Hernández as president.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) criticizes the World Bank's draft Guidance Notes accompanying its 2018 environmental and social policy, stating that most notes lack tangible recommendations and fail to reference international human rights and environmental laws. While CIEL notes positive elements in the guidance regarding resource efficiency, pollution prevention, and core labor standards, it argues that the overall framework relies on vague language and excludes civil society from the creation process. CIEL calls for the Bank to develop robust, specific guidance and allow further civil society feedback to avoid reputational risks and ensure sustainable development.

A joint statement by six NGOs criticizing EU governments for attempting to weaken the Effort Sharing Regulation, arguing that their current position would result in a reduction of less than 25% of emissions by 2030, failing to meet the 30% target supported by the European Parliament.

Friends of the Earth International denounces the Argentine government for cancelling the accreditation of 61 civil society representatives for the December 2017 WTO meeting in Buenos Aires. The organization argues that WTO policies often hinder climate action, such as the ruling against India's National Solar Mission, and penalize developing countries' food storage programs while allowing subsidies in the EU and US. The statement further criticizes the lack of transparency in trade agreements like RCEP and TTIP, calling for a trade system based on human rights, sustainable environmental policy, and food sovereignty.

The Clean Air Task Force criticizes the API's Environmental Partnership as an insufficient voluntary effort to curb methane emissions, noting that its targets for leak detection and pneumatic controller replacement are far weaker than existing state and federal regulations. The authors argue that voluntary programs cannot achieve the same emission reductions as mandatory, cost-effective standards, highlighting that oil and gas equipment in the US releases over 8 million tons of methane annually.

The document critiques the CCME's 'State of the Air' report, arguing that the Air Quality Management System (AQMS) is too narrow by focusing primarily on ozone and PM2.5 while neglecting other harmful pollutants, particularly in resource-extraction regions of western Canada. CAPE highlights significant data gaps caused by emissions reporting thresholds and calls for a more comprehensive monitoring approach that includes volatile organic compounds (VOCs), sulphur oxides (SOx), and nitrogen oxides (NOx), as well as a clearer link between air quality management levels and specific enforcement actions.

Rose Garr of Waxman Strategies criticizes the EPA's Renewable Fuel Volume Obligations for maintaining a reliance on corn ethanol and soy biodiesel while failing to increase the use of cellulosic fuels, arguing that this approach exacerbates pollution in the Gulf of Mexico and the Midwest.

The Centre for Environmental Rights, on behalf of the Life After Coal/Impilo Ngaphandle Kwamalahle Campaign, urges the Portfolio Committee on Energy to compel the Department of Energy to release key technical data and conduct fair public consultations before finalising the IRP Update and IEP. The submission highlights the Department's failure to respond to PAIA requests for modelling assumptions and tariff implications. It further argues that the current planning ignores the health and water costs of coal, the emissions of nitrous oxide from CFB technology, and the financial viability of new coal and nuclear plants. Citing studies by Meridian Economics and the Frankfurt Institute, the document asserts that accelerating the decommissioning of older coal stations and prioritising wind and solar PV is the most cost-effective path for South Africa's energy future.

A coalition of environmental and social justice organisations has formally objected to a planned 'energy indaba' scheduled for December 2017, arguing that it does not constitute meaningful public participation for the draft Integrated Energy Plan (IEP) and Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Update. The organisations claim the event's short notice and single venue in Gauteng exclude many affected parties. Furthermore, they allege that the Department of Energy has failed to provide critical technical reports and modelling data requested under the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA), which are essential for stakeholders to provide informed input on South Africa's energy future.

The text examines the developmental gap between Poland's major metropolises and its smaller urban centers. It criticizes the 'polarization-diffusion' strategy of the 2000s, which favored large cities, and discusses the subsequent 'Strategy for Responsible Development' (SOR) under the PiS government. While noting issues like 'facade modernization' and local political stagnation, the author provides examples of small towns—such as Ostrów Wielkopolski and Słupsk—that have successfully implemented innovative housing, social integration, and revitalization projects by leveraging local potential rather than imitating Western models.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) asserts that the European Commission's consultation on the Multilateral Investment Court failed to meet democratic standards of public participation. CIEL's analysis of nearly 200 narrative comments revealed that nearly two-thirds of respondents opposed the court or demanded fundamental ISDS reforms first, contradicting the Commission's claim of 'broad support'. Consequently, CIEL urges EU Member States to reject the court's mandate and instead cancel or renegotiate existing agreements containing investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms.

The Institute for Policy Integrity submitted comments to the Federal Highway Administration and the US Army Corps of Engineers, challenging the claim that project-level greenhouse gas emissions are too insignificant to contribute to climate change. The Institute asserts that agencies are required to address climate effects and should follow Circular A-4 and best economic practices by quantifying and monetizing these emissions, noting that the US Army Corps specifically fails to consider downstream emissions from oil drilling.

The document outlines opposition to a Draft Screening Assessment regarding hydrogen sulfide (H2S), sodium bisulfide (Na(SH)), and sodium sulfide (Na2S). The authors argue that H2S poses significant risks to human health, particularly for communities near oil and gas operations, and that the government's assessment fails to apply a precautionary approach or account for olfactory nuisance as an adverse effect.

Friends of the Earth International asserts that the current global energy model, dominated by fossil fuels and corporate-led 'false solutions', is driving a planetary emergency. The statement criticizes the Paris Agreement as insufficient and legally unenforceable, calling for urgent emission reductions by wealthy nations and a shift toward decentralized, community-led energy systems.

The statement by Friends of the Earth International characterizes the current climate situation as a 'planetary emergency' and criticizes the Paris Agreement for lacking legal enforcement and science-based cuts. It calls for the immediate end of fossil fuels—noting that over 1600 new coal plants are planned in 62 countries—and warns against 'false solutions' such as nuclear power and large-scale hydroelectric projects. The document advocates for a just transition where developed countries, whose 10% population is responsible for 50% of emissions, lead deep cuts and fund sustainable development in the global South. It promotes decentralized, people-centered community energy, agroecology, and community forest management as the only viable future.

The report examines the synergies between Community Forest Management (CFM) and agroecology, positioning them as essential tools for food sovereignty and biodiversity conservation. It critiques the 'green economy' and market-based conservation models like REDD+, arguing that they erode traditional values and community autonomy. The document specifically challenges the FAO's definition of forests for including monoculture plantations, which it claims facilitates deforestation and undermines the livelihoods of the 1.6 billion people dependent on forests. It advocates for the recognition of territorial control, women's autonomy, and traditional knowledge as the primary drivers of effective forest protection.