Browse all documents

JOINT LETTER REGARDING THE ENERGY INDABA ON 5-6 DECEMBER 2017

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

A joint letter from 23 environmental and social organisations to the South African Minister of Energy expressing serious objections to the process surrounding the draft Integrated Energy Plan (IEP) and the draft update to the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) for Electricity, specifically regarding a planned 'energy indaba' in December 2017.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The signatories object to the 'energy indaba' scheduled for 7 and 8 December 2017, arguing it does not constitute adequate public participation for decision-making on the IEP and IRP Update. They cite the unreasonably short notice, the scheduling during a busy time of year, and the limitation to a single venue in Gauteng as barriers that violate the rights of affected people and organisations to be heard.
  • The organisations claim that the Department of Energy has failed to provide a clear purpose or a detailed agenda for the indaba, making meaningful participation impossible. They also criticize the registration form for omitting 'coal' as a category of business, despite its significant impacts on climate, water, soil, and air quality.
  • The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER), on behalf of groundWork, alleges that the Department of Energy has ignored or inadequately responded to a Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) request submitted on 31 July 2017. The request sought technical reports and data underpinning the IRP process, including tariff implications and energy modelling inputs.
  • The signatories demand access to specific detailed data and modelling inputs to allow for expert analysis, including Excel sheets for overnight costs, CAPEX, fuel costs, CO2 emission factors, and water usage for all technologies. They also request the 15 scenarios presented by the IRP team, including the Reference Case, Optimum Plan, Low Growth Scenario, Carbon Budget Plan, and Forced Nuclear scenario.
  • The organisations assert that without access to the requested technical documents and a reasonable timeframe to analyze them with expert assistance, stakeholders cannot provide meaningful input on the draft IEP and IRP Update.

Cite the original document

APA
Centre for Environmental Rights (2017). JOINT LETTER REGARDING THE ENERGY INDABA ON 5-6 DECEMBER 2017. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Joint-letter-to-Minister-re-Energy-Indaba-28-Nov-2017.docx.pdf?x21779
Chicago
Centre for Environmental Rights. JOINT LETTER REGARDING THE ENERGY INDABA ON 5-6 DECEMBER 2017. 2017. https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Joint-letter-to-Minister-re-Energy-Indaba-28-Nov-2017.docx.pdf?x21779.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=Centre for Environmental Rights |title=JOINT LETTER REGARDING THE ENERGY INDABA ON 5-6 DECEMBER 2017 |date=28 November 2017 |url=https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Joint-letter-to-Minister-re-Energy-Indaba-28-Nov-2017.docx.pdf?x21779 |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{centreforenvironmentalrights2017joint, author = {{Centre for Environmental Rights}}, title = {{JOINT LETTER REGARDING THE ENERGY INDABA ON 5-6 DECEMBER 2017}}, publisher = {Centre for Environmental Rights}, year = {2017}, month = nov, url = {https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Joint-letter-to-Minister-re-Energy-Indaba-28-Nov-2017.docx.pdf?x21779}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated