APRM PEER REVIEW: 10 YEARS OF GOVERNANCE IN AFRICA

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document describes a planned conference, 'The APRM +10: Reviewing a Decade of Peer Learning and Projecting a Future of Governance in Africa', to be held in Addis Ababa in May 2013. It seeks to evaluate the APRM's progress since its 2003 establishment, specifically focusing on the implementation of National Programmes of Action (NPoAs) and the role of civil society in holding member states accountable. The briefing highlights the tension between the voluntary nature of the APRM and the compulsory nature of the African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance (ACDEG), while calling for better synergies between the APRM and other AU organs, such as the Pan African Parliament and the Peace and Security Commission.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), established on 9 March 2003, is a voluntary self-monitoring instrument designed to promote political stability, economic growth, sustainable development, and continental economic integration.
  • As of January 2013, 33 countries have voluntarily joined the APRM, with 15 countries having completed the self-assessment and peer review process.
  • Despite its progress, the APRM is described as being enclosed in a 'black box', where recommendations from review exercises are often ignored or shelved, particularly the National Programmes of Action (NPoAs).
  • There is a need to analyze the relationship between the voluntary APRM and the compulsory African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance (ACDEG), which had been ratified by 16 countries by the time of the briefing.

Cite the original document

APA
South African Institute of International Affairs (2013). APRM PEER REVIEW: 10 YEARS OF GOVERNANCE IN AFRICA. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/APRM_Colloquium_2013_-_CONCEPT_NOTE.pdf
Chicago
South African Institute of International Affairs. APRM PEER REVIEW: 10 YEARS OF GOVERNANCE IN AFRICA. 2013. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/APRM_Colloquium_2013_-_CONCEPT_NOTE.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=South African Institute of International Affairs |title=APRM PEER REVIEW: 10 YEARS OF GOVERNANCE IN AFRICA |date=2013 |url=https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/APRM_Colloquium_2013_-_CONCEPT_NOTE.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{southafricaninstituteofinternationalaffairs2013aprm, author = {{South African Institute of International Affairs}}, title = {{APRM PEER REVIEW: 10 YEARS OF GOVERNANCE IN AFRICA}}, institution = {South African Institute of International Affairs}, year = {2013}, url = {https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/APRM_Colloquium_2013_-_CONCEPT_NOTE.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated