A CONSORTIUM APPROACH TO TRANSIT DATA INTEROPERABILITY

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report argues that interoperable transit data is essential for the realization of 'mobility as a service' (MaaS), which allows users to seamlessly combine various transportation modes. It identifies significant barriers to this goal, including poor data quality, a lack of standardization for ride-hailing and car-sharing, and misaligned incentives. The authors estimate that achieving full data interoperability could boost ridership of alternative transportation by 5% to 10%, representing a market opportunity of $3 billion to $6 billion in the U.S. To address these challenges, the report proposes the formation of a cross-industry consortium to establish and maintain data standards and innovate in user-interface design and payment technology.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The U.S. market potential for transit data interoperability is estimated to be between $3 billion and $6 billion, with the potential to increase ridership of alternative transportation modes by 5% to 10%.
  • Five primary barriers hinder data interoperability: poor quality and incomplete data, a lack of data standardization, nascent technology and design, misaligned incentives, and inadequate public engagement.
  • While standards like GTFS and GBFS exist for mass transit and bikeshare, they are often incomplete; for example, GTFS-RT lacks fields for real-time vehicle capacity, and no comprehensive standards exist for digital ride-hail and carshare.
  • The report proposes a multistakeholder consortium to solve global-scale challenges in data standardization and technology/design, as single stakeholders often lack the incentive or expertise to create industry-wide solutions.
  • Immediate, non-consortium opportunities for improvement include transit agencies improving the quality of static GTFS feeds, bikeshare operators adopting GBFS, and municipalities promoting existing transit tools to the public.

Cite the original document

APA
CRANE, J., & RUCKS, G. (2016). A CONSORTIUM APPROACH TO TRANSIT DATA INTEROPERABILITY. RMI. https://rmi.org/app/uploads/2017/03/consortium_approach_to_ITD_report2016.pdf
Chicago
CRANE, JACKSON, and GREG RUCKS. A CONSORTIUM APPROACH TO TRANSIT DATA INTEROPERABILITY. RMI, 2016. https://rmi.org/app/uploads/2017/03/consortium_approach_to_ITD_report2016.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=CRANE |first1=JACKSON |last2=RUCKS |first2=GREG |title=A CONSORTIUM APPROACH TO TRANSIT DATA INTEROPERABILITY |publisher=RMI |date=December 2016 |url=https://rmi.org/app/uploads/2017/03/consortium_approach_to_ITD_report2016.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{crane2016consortium, author = {CRANE, JACKSON and RUCKS, GREG}, title = {{A CONSORTIUM APPROACH TO TRANSIT DATA INTEROPERABILITY}}, institution = {RMI}, year = {2016}, month = dec, url = {https://rmi.org/app/uploads/2017/03/consortium_approach_to_ITD_report2016.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated