Browse all documents

A CONSORTIUM APPROACH TO TRANSIT DATA INTEROPERABILITY

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This report by the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) examines the barriers to transit data interoperability in the United States and proposes a multistakeholder consortium to develop industry-wide data standards. The authors argue that interoperable data is essential for 'mobility as a service' (MaaS), which allows users to seamlessly combine various transportation modes. The report identifies significant market potential for improved data sharing and provides a detailed set of minimum data requirements for transportation service providers (TSPs) to enable a complete multimodal user experience.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The potential market opportunity for improved transit data interoperability in the U.S. is estimated to be between $3 billion and $6 billion, with the potential to increase ridership by 5 to 10 percent.
  • Five primary barriers hinder data interoperability: poor quality and incomplete data, a lack of data standardization, nascent technology and design, misaligned incentives, and inadequate public engagement.
  • While standards like the General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) and General Bikeshare Feed Specification (GBFS) exist, they are often incomplete or not universally adopted. For example, GTFS-RT lacks fields for real-time vehicle capacity, and many TNCs use custom APIs that limit data sharing to protect competitive advantages.
  • The report proposes a cross-industry consortium to address global-scale challenges, specifically data standardization and technology/design barriers, as single stakeholders often lack the incentive or expertise to create industry-wide solutions.
  • Immediate, local-scale improvements can be made without a consortium, such as transit agencies improving the quality of static GTFS feeds, bikeshare operators adopting GBFS, and municipalities promoting existing transit tools to the public.
  • The document establishes a comprehensive set of minimum data requirements across six categories—Location, Service, Station, Payment, Booking, and Identification—to ensure users can make informed decisions about multimodal routing.

Cite the original document

APA
CRANE, J., & RUCKS, G. (2016). A CONSORTIUM APPROACH TO TRANSIT DATA INTEROPERABILITY. RMI. https://rmi.org/app/uploads/2017/03/consortium_approach_to_ITD_report2016.pdf
Chicago
CRANE, JACKSON, and GREG RUCKS. A CONSORTIUM APPROACH TO TRANSIT DATA INTEROPERABILITY. RMI, 2016. https://rmi.org/app/uploads/2017/03/consortium_approach_to_ITD_report2016.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=CRANE |first1=JACKSON |last2=RUCKS |first2=GREG |title=A CONSORTIUM APPROACH TO TRANSIT DATA INTEROPERABILITY |publisher=RMI |date=December 2016 |url=https://rmi.org/app/uploads/2017/03/consortium_approach_to_ITD_report2016.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{crane2016consortium, author = {CRANE, JACKSON and RUCKS, GREG}, title = {{A CONSORTIUM APPROACH TO TRANSIT DATA INTEROPERABILITY}}, institution = {RMI}, year = {2016}, month = dec, url = {https://rmi.org/app/uploads/2017/03/consortium_approach_to_ITD_report2016.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated