Análise do Novo Procedimento Administrativo Sancionador do Ibama e seus Reflexos no Combate ao Desmatamento na Amazônia

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report examines the transition of Ibama's environmental sanctioning process toward a model centered on environmental conciliation. It argues that while conciliation could theoretically speed up processes, its implementation under the current administration has been deficient due to regulatory delays, a lack of technical qualification in key appointments, and a dangerous centralization of power. These failures, combined with the replacement of career staff with political appointees, are found to weaken the deterrent effect of environmental fines and contribute to increased deforestation in the Amazon.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The introduction of environmental conciliation via Decree No. 9,760/2019 aimed to increase the speed of the sanctioning process, but implementation has been flawed due to late and uncoordinated regulation, ambiguous scheduling rules for hearings, and a lack of transparency in data.
  • The new framework allows for a preliminary review of infringement notices by a hierarchically superior authority without a defined scope, deadline, or requirement for a reasoned technical opinion, granting excessive discretion and potential censorship over field agents' work.
  • Processual instruction has been centralized in the National Instruction Team (Enins), which could create a bottleneck if the team lacks sufficient numbers or technical qualification, potentially making the sanctioning procedure longer and less effective.
  • Judgment authority for infringement notices has been concentrated in state superintendents (1st instance) and the president of Ibama (2nd instance), increasing the workload for these individuals and making the process more susceptible to political control.
  • There is a systemic replacement of career technical staff in strategic positions with individuals lacking environmental management experience or technical qualifications, which undermines the government's capacity to effectively investigate environmental infractions.
  • Frequent changes to the legal frameworks of the federal environmental sanctioning procedure have created legal uncertainty and paralyzed inspection and investigation activities.
  • The failure of the sanctioning procedure and the weakening of environmental governance have direct negative impacts on the fight against Amazon deforestation by reducing the accountability of offenders and the deterrent power of sanctions.
  • Between 2018 and 2020, while the Amazon deforestation rate increased by 47%, the number of infringement notices for flora-related offenses decreased by 56%.

Cite the original document

APA
Lopes, C. L., & Chiavari, J. (2021). Análise do Novo Procedimento Administrativo Sancionador do Ibama e seus Reflexos no Combate ao Desmatamento na Amazônia. Climate Policy Initiative. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Relatorio-Analise-do-Novo-Procedimento-Administrativo-Sancionador-do-Ibama.pdf
Chicago
Lopes, Cristina Leme, and Joana Chiavari. Análise do Novo Procedimento Administrativo Sancionador do Ibama e seus Reflexos no Combate ao Desmatamento na Amazônia. Climate Policy Initiative, 2021. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Relatorio-Analise-do-Novo-Procedimento-Administrativo-Sancionador-do-Ibama.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Lopes |first1=Cristina Leme |last2=Chiavari |first2=Joana |title=Análise do Novo Procedimento Administrativo Sancionador do Ibama e seus Reflexos no Combate ao Desmatamento na Amazônia |publisher=Climate Policy Initiative |date=June 2021 |url=https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Relatorio-Analise-do-Novo-Procedimento-Administrativo-Sancionador-do-Ibama.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{lopes2021anlise, author = {Lopes, Cristina Leme and Chiavari, Joana}, title = {{Análise do Novo Procedimento Administrativo Sancionador do Ibama e seus Reflexos no Combate ao Desmatamento na Amazônia}}, institution = {Climate Policy Initiative}, year = {2021}, month = jun, url = {https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Relatorio-Analise-do-Novo-Procedimento-Administrativo-Sancionador-do-Ibama.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated