RECONCILING NATIONAL ADAPTATION POLICIES WITH LOCAL LEVEL IMPLEMENTATION IN SIDS: INSIGHTS FOR REPLICATION

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document examines the 'adaptation deficit' and 'scale mismatch' in SIDS, where national adaptation plans often fail to incorporate local community needs. Using the GIVRAPD project's research in Jamaica, Mauritius, the Seychelles, and St Lucia, it argues that many implementation barriers are surmountable through stakeholder workshops and collaborative governance. A case study of the Soufriere Marine Management Area in St. Lucia illustrates how evolving from a top-down institution to a multi-stakeholder association can improve adaptive capacity.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • There is a significant gap between national adaptation policies and local implementation in SIDS, as projects often respond to national priorities with "little input is sought from the local level", leading to a disconnect where the actual impacts of climate change are most felt.
  • Implementation challenges in SIDS are driven by an "adaptation deficit, scale mismatch, sectoral approaches, and diverse stakeholder needs", which hinder the translation of global climate scenarios into actionable local plans.
  • Many barriers to local adaptation are surmountable using existing internal resources without needing international expertise; for instance, data gaps on local vulnerabilities can be solved by "establishing and reinforcing national units and adaptation taskforces" and utilizing citizen science.
  • Some adaptation barriers are deeply embedded in "historical practices"—including education, cultural values, and sectoral approaches—and require long-term institutional and behavioral changes to resolve.
  • The Soufriere Marine Management Area (SMMA) in St. Lucia demonstrates that moving from a "top-down state institution to an inclusive and collaborative multi-stakeholder association" allows for better governance fit and the ability to address emerging threats like climate change.

Cite the original document

APA
Climate and Development Knowledge Network (2015). RECONCILING NATIONAL ADAPTATION POLICIES WITH LOCAL LEVEL IMPLEMENTATION IN SIDS: INSIGHTS FOR REPLICATION. http://cdkn.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/4GIVRAPD_Policy_Brief_Reconciling_National_Adaptation_Policies.pdf
Chicago
Climate and Development Knowledge Network. RECONCILING NATIONAL ADAPTATION POLICIES WITH LOCAL LEVEL IMPLEMENTATION IN SIDS: INSIGHTS FOR REPLICATION. 2015. http://cdkn.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/4GIVRAPD_Policy_Brief_Reconciling_National_Adaptation_Policies.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Climate and Development Knowledge Network |title=RECONCILING NATIONAL ADAPTATION POLICIES WITH LOCAL LEVEL IMPLEMENTATION IN SIDS: INSIGHTS FOR REPLICATION |date=July 2015 |url=http://cdkn.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/4GIVRAPD_Policy_Brief_Reconciling_National_Adaptation_Policies.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{climateanddevelopmentknowledgenetwork2015reconciling, author = {{Climate and Development Knowledge Network}}, title = {{RECONCILING NATIONAL ADAPTATION POLICIES WITH LOCAL LEVEL IMPLEMENTATION IN SIDS: INSIGHTS FOR REPLICATION}}, institution = {Climate and Development Knowledge Network}, year = {2015}, month = jul, url = {http://cdkn.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/4GIVRAPD_Policy_Brief_Reconciling_National_Adaptation_Policies.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated