Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines the strategic utility of the South African Navy in supporting the 'African Renaissance' goal, extending its duties beyond sovereign defence to include peace support, environmental protection, border control, and disaster relief.

The National Chairman of the South African Institute of International Affairs argues that South Africa's global credibility depends on its domestic stewardship and responsible leadership. The statement identifies key tests for the country, including maintaining institutional integrity and collaborating on global issues like climate change and poverty reduction. It emphasizes the need for African states to manage relations with emerging powers like China and India through good governance and to actively participate in the transition to a low-carbon economy.

The report details a scoping workshop held in Johannesburg in October 2010 to launch the APRM Monitoring Project (AMP). The project seeks to empower civil society organisations (CSOs) in Southern Africa to track the implementation of National Programmes of Action (NPoA) through the APRM Monitoring & Advocacy Template (AMAT). The workshop identified challenges such as limited CSO resources, low public visibility of the APRM, and the need for collaborative rather than antagonistic relationships with governments. Lessons from Uganda's NGO Forum highlighted the value of aligning APRM monitoring with existing governance networks. The workshop concluded with a consensus on the need for an independent, inclusive, and grassroots-oriented review process.

China is evolving from a 'studied passivity' in the UN Security Council to a more assertive role, driven by the need to protect its economic interests and enhance its global reputation. This shift is most evident in Africa, where Beijing has moved from opposing international intervention to supporting UN peacekeeping operations and Chapter VII resolutions in Sudan and Somalia. While China maintains a formal commitment to national sovereignty, it increasingly adopts a case-by-case approach to intervention to secure energy assets and maintain its image as a 'responsible stakeholder'.

The document analyzes China's strategy of accessing previously untapped natural resources in Africa, often in ecologically fragile areas with weak governance. It highlights the central role of the China Exim Bank in financing large-scale infrastructure and extractive projects, noting a historical lack of adherence to international environmental standards. Using the Merowe Dam in Sudan as a primary case study, the author illustrates significant social and environmental failures. While the Chinese government has begun introducing social and environmental guidelines and 'green credit' policies, the report warns that stricter domestic regulations may inadvertently encourage the relocation of polluting industries to Africa.

The document analyzes the transition of French foreign policy in Africa from 'la Francafrique'—characterized by personal ties to corrupt elites in former colonies—to a strategy of 'partnership' between equal nations. This shift involves a move toward multilateralism through the European Union and a strategic pivot toward new markets and power-brokers, specifically South Africa. Key drivers for this change include the 'Abidjan doctrine' on economic governance, the devaluation of the CFA franc, and a desire to move beyond a relationship driven by colonial guilt. The text highlights South Africa's role as France's leading economic partner in Africa, noting cooperation in military training in the Central African Republic and nuclear energy projects involving the company Areva.

Since 1994, South Africa has acted as a primary catalyst for African integration, leveraging its economic dominance and diplomatic efforts to promote the 'African Renaissance'. While it leads in conflict resolution and institutional building through the AU and SADC, it faces tensions regarding its perceived 'big brother' role and a persistent trade imbalance with other African states. Its global role involves representing African interests in the G20 and UN Security Council, though its moral authority is sometimes undermined by a reluctance to criticize fellow African leaders, specifically in Zimbabwe.

The report examines the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), an African self-monitoring tool for governance, democracy, and human rights adopted under the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (Nepad). Based on a five-year research project by the South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA), the text analyzes the rules, national governance, and research processes of the APRM. It specifically focuses on the experiences of five pioneer countries—Ghana, Kenya, Rwanda, Mauritius, and South Africa—to identify the political dynamics and the role of civil society in making the process credible. The document argues that the APRM represents a 'governance revolution' in Africa, shifting from post-independence rule by decree toward accountability and transparency.

The African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), launched in 2002 under the New Partnership for Africa's Development (Nepad), is a voluntary governance assessment tool for African states. It employs a five-stage process involving national self-assessment, expert review, and peer review by heads of state. Early implementation in 'pioneer' countries like Ghana, Rwanda, Kenya, and South Africa revealed that the process is significantly more time-consuming than initially estimated, often taking 33 to 39 months rather than the projected six to nine. The document highlights the critical role of civil society in the National Governing Councils and the challenges of managing the political tensions inherent in open governance critiques.

The document examines the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) as a political process, highlighting the tensions between governments and civil society in pioneer countries. It identifies systemic failures in the APRM's operational guidelines, specifically regarding timeframes, research methods, and the development of Programmes of Action (POAs). The authors propose the 'COPPER' principles (Candid, Open, Planned, Participatory, Exemplary, Rigorous) to ensure a credible review and provide a detailed strategy for civil society to influence the process through evidence-based written submissions and media engagement. The report concludes that the APRM's success depends on presidential leadership, transparent governing councils, and a shift in focus from merely identifying problems to crafting detailed, accountable solutions in the POA.

The report examines the early experiences of five African nations implementing the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM). It highlights a tension between government-led processes and the need for independent civil society oversight to ensure candid self-assessments. While Ghana is praised for its independent governing council and robust research, Kenya's experience warns of civil society fragmentation and personal gain. Rwanda's process is noted for being heavily government-driven in a restrictive political climate, and Mauritius is presented as a case of failure due to a lack of political will and institutional capacity. South Africa's process is critiqued for unrealistic timelines and government attempts to sanitize findings, though it is noted for its extensive use of the internet and indigenous languages for outreach.

The document provides a comprehensive analysis of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), focusing on the experiences of pioneer countries. It details the official guidance documents, the five stages of the review process, and the critical roles of national institutions like the Focal Point and National Governing Council. A significant portion of the text is dedicated to '80 Lessons for Success,' offering strategic advice on planning, governance, media engagement, and the use of the Self-Assessment Questionnaire. It emphasizes the necessity of civil society leadership, transparency, and rigorous research to ensure the mechanism's credibility and effectiveness in fostering good governance across Africa.

The briefing examines China's policy of offering duty-free treatment to 440 products from 30 African LDCs. While the scheme is tailored to existing export capacities, the author argues its economic impact is modest compared to its symbolic diplomatic value in signaling China's rise as a great power and alternative to Western donors.

The report analyzes the early experiences of countries implementing the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), highlighting critical gaps in national governance, technical research, and the formulation of actionable reform plans. It argues that while the self-assessment phase often generates sound analysis, the resulting Programmes of Action (POAs) are frequently superficial and lack the detail necessary for effective implementation and monitoring. The authors provide a set of best practices for research, public consultation, and the creation of more rigorous, costed, and prioritized POAs to ensure the mechanism leads to substantive governance improvements.

The briefing examines the 'ideational shift' and 'rational adaptation' of developing countries in the WTO, moving from individual participation to the use of formal and informal coalitions. It argues that these coalitions allow the 'South' to pool resources and increase their collective power to influence decision-making, particularly since the launch of the Doha negotiations. The author highlights that while developed countries no longer dominate WTO governance, a stalemate persists due to resistance to the South's development agenda. The document concludes that the WTO experience provides a model for improving developing country action in other global economic institutions.

South Africa operates as a decentralized development partner in Africa, primarily through peacekeeping, education, and research for development. While it lacks a centralized agency and systematic tracking, it utilizes the African Renaissance Fund and various government departments to support African renewal. The country increasingly employs trilateral partnerships with traditional donors to enhance its continental influence while managing costs and perceptions.

The document explains the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) as a voluntary process for African governments and citizens to assess governance and implement reforms. It outlines a five-step methodology for civil society organisations (CSOs) to create effective written submissions: identifying a focused issue, gathering evidence from diverse sources, developing persuasive arguments, building consensus through circulation, and submitting to the correct official bodies. The guide emphasises that evidence-backed submissions are more impactful than oral presentations and provides examples of successful advocacy by groups in Uganda and South Africa.

The report analyzes China's engagement with the Lusophone world through the Macau Forum, established in 2003. It argues that China uses the forum as a foreign policy instrument to secure energy and food security, expand its consumer markets, and increase soft power in Africa, Latin America, and Asia. While trade volumes grew from $11 billion in 2003 to $34 billion in 2006, the report notes that most significant economic agreements remain bilateral. Brazil and Angola are identified as the most critical partners due to their vast natural resources and economic scale. The document also highlights the role of Macau as a service platform and provides policy recommendations for China, the Lusophone states, and the Forum to improve transparency and mutual benefit.

The document examines the multifaceted relationship between Ghana and China, highlighting China's role as a major development partner providing infrastructure loans and technical assistance. It analyzes the trade imbalance characterized by Ghana's export of primary commodities and import of Chinese manufactured goods, and evaluates Chinese foreign direct investment, which is predominantly concentrated in non-extractive sectors through small and medium-sized enterprises.

The report identifies administrative and trade policy non-tariff barriers (NTBs) that increase the cost of business along the South Africa-Zimbabwe trade route. Key findings highlight severe delays at the Beit Bridge border crossing, where some trucks take an average of 2.5 days to clear. Zimbabwean foreign exchange controls are identified as the most costly trade policy NTB across multiple sectors, effectively acting as an export tax. Additionally, the report notes significant infrastructure failures in the regional rail network, forcing a reliance on more expensive road transport, and capacity constraints at Durban port that lead to costly truck congestion.