Search Climate Insights Directory

The report provides a comprehensive overview of how antisemitism manifests across various online ecosystems, from mainstream platforms like X and YouTube to fringe spaces like Telegram and Discord. It details the roles of far-right, Islamist, far-left, and conspiracy-driven actors, highlighting how global crises—such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and the October 7 Hamas attacks—fuel surges in online hate. The document also examines the persistence of Holocaust denial and the emergence of 'ideologically hybridised' antisemitism, where diverse extremist groups coalesce around shared tropes.

The document evaluates various digital interventions to protect elections, including content moderation, algorithmic adjustments, and transparency measures. It highlights a significant gap in data access for researchers and a geographic imbalance in mitigation efforts, which primarily focus on Western contexts. The authors argue for a multi-stakeholder approach and standardized data access to improve the efficacy of electoral safeguarding.

The report analyzes the surge of online Holocaust denial and distortion after October 7, 2023, highlighting a shift toward 'Holocaust glorification' and the use of Nazi symbolism. It evaluates the effectiveness of social media platforms in moderating such content, finding that while YouTube remains relatively neutral, platforms like X, Gab, and 4chan frequently display denialist content. The document also explores the risks of generative AI in producing photorealistic but distorted historical imagery and the potential for AI to enhance Holocaust education through personalized learning and survivor testimony preservation.

The report analyzes the Irish Channel's role in spreading misinformation, specifically regarding election interference and immigration. It details the site's connection to the Irish Freedom Party and its operation as part of the Premier Content Network, a content aggregation system. The analysis also suggests the use of generative AI to produce articles containing factual errors and fabricated citations.

The report analyzes how Russian propaganda has shifted from official state media to semi-covert tactics to bypass EU sanctions, while maintaining significant reach in the MENA region and Latin America. It identifies key vulnerabilities in the Western alliance—including economic stagnation in Germany, US isolationism, and the rise of far-right parties in the EU—that the Kremlin is likely to exploit. Additionally, it examines how Russia instrumentalizes the Israel-Hamas conflict to portray Western 'double standards' and promote a multipolar world order.

The document examines how disparate fringe movements—including the far right, far left, and Islamist groups—find common ground through shared antisemitic narratives. It highlights a trend of 'hybridisation' on social media where these groups cross-fertilise narratives, such as the belief that Jews possess disproportionate global power or the conspiracy theory that Israel was responsible for the October 7 attacks. The briefing argues that antisemitism is best predicted by conspiratorial worldviews and authoritarian preferences rather than specific left- or right-wing political views, and calls for a 'cross-harm perspective' to tackle these intersecting hate narratives.

The document analyzes how various extremist groups in Germany—including far-right, far-left, Islamist, and QAnon-affiliated actors—exploited the Israel-Gaza crisis to spread disinformation, promote hate speech, and polarize political debate. While these groups differ in their targets, they converge in their distrust of the German government's response. Key activities include the AfD's internal struggle to unify its position, Samidoun's celebration of Hamas violence in Berlin, and the spread of 'deep state' and 'third World War' conspiracy theories by QAnon-affiliated channels.

The document analyzes a shift in Salafi-jihadist online propaganda, noting that while 'legacy' accounts continue to share official al-Qaeda and Islamic State media, a younger 'support' network is utilizing 'shitposting' and 'chan culture' aesthetics. These newer networks blend official terrorist content with international far-right imagery, 'gore' content, and internet trolling to mock the United States and its victims. The research identifies a 'meme pipeline' where content is developed on Telegram and distributed via Facebook and TikTok, often intersecting with neo-Nazi and accelerationist aesthetics.

The document describes a comprehensive public health approach to preventing targeted violence, moving away from targeting specific ideologies or communities toward addressing behavioral indicators and environmental conditions. It outlines a four-tiered framework—primordial, primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention—designed to build individual and community resilience. The model emphasizes evidence-based programming and the involvement of multi-sector stakeholders, including educators, mental health professionals, and law enforcement, to 'desecuritize' the field of violent extremism prevention.

The document is divided into two main sections: a report on regulatory developments in Canada, Ireland, the UK, and the US regarding online streaming, safety codes, advertising, and AI; and a snapshot of literature on climate disinformation. The latter highlights the shift from outright climate denial to 'delay discourses' and 'culture wars' frames, the role of fossil fuel interests in seeding misinformation, and the impact of fringe websites and algorithmic amplification on digital platforms.

The Coalition to Counter Online Antisemitism (CCOA), funded by Google.org and the TIDES Foundation through 2026, is a multi-stakeholder initiative designed to address the rise of online antisemitism in Europe. The project aims to bridge gaps between research, education, and policy by coordinating efforts across ten countries, including Germany, France, and the UK. The CCOA operates through three dedicated working groups focused on research, education, and policy to scale primary prevention and counter-speech efforts.

The guide examines the critical need for public interest researchers to access social media data to monitor platform accountability and systemic risks. It details the current landscape of regulatory frameworks in the EU and US, identifies technological, legal, and fragmentation barriers, and categorizes the types of data required—user-generated, platform curation, and platform decision-making data—to advance collective knowledge and ensure regulatory compliance.

The 'New World Order' conspiracy theory posits that a shadowy elite is working to establish a totalitarian one-world government through manufactured crises and the manipulation of media and democracy. The document details how this narrative overlaps with 18th-century Illuminati theories and has been adopted by right-wing extremist and militia movements. It highlights a strong connection to antisemitism, where the 'New World Order' is often conflated with a 'Jew World Order' (JWO), targeting figures like George Soros and the Rothschild family. Proponents claim the United Nations, the Bilderberg Group, and the COVID-19 pandemic are tools used by this elite to restrict individual freedoms and implement global control.

The 'Climate Lockdown' narrative is a conspiracy theory claiming that global elites use climate change as a pretext to restrict civil liberties. Emerging in early 2020, the term shifted from early discussions about environmental benefits of COVID-19 lockdowns to a tool for climate sceptics and anti-elite movements. By late 2022, the narrative evolved to target urban planning initiatives, specifically '15-minute cities' and traffic filters in Oxford, UK, falsely framing them as precursors to authoritarian movement restrictions.

The report examines the information asymmetry between social media platforms and public interest researchers, identifying technological, legal, and ethical barriers to data access. It evaluates existing mechanisms such as transparency reporting, API access, and crowdsourced data donations, while analyzing the impact of the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA) and GDPR. The authors recommend the creation of an independent intermediary body to vet researchers and the alignment of international standards to ensure a safe, transparent, and evidence-based approach to studying the societal impacts of digital platforms.

The document defines various forms of information disorder—misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, and information manipulation—and explains their impact on political work, such as the undermining of public debate and the defamation of politicians. It provides a framework for establishing monitoring environments using OSINT tools, a methodology for evaluating incidents via the ABCDE-Framework and a priority matrix, and a set of strategic communication (StratKom) recommendations ranging from reactive measures like debunking to proactive strategies like prebunking and resilience building.

The report documents 203 incidents of anti-drag mobilization in the US, noting an increase in activity in early 2023 compared to late 2022. It identifies a diverse coalition of actors—including the Proud Boys, parents' rights groups, and anti-vaccine activists—who employ tactics such as doxxing, vandalism, and the 'groomer' narrative to intimidate performers and venues. The analysis highlights the real-world consequences of this hate, including the cancellation of events and the financial distress of small businesses.

The report details the outcomes of the 'Im toten Winkel' conference, highlighting how right-wing extremists employ a 'multi-platform strategy' combining mainstream sites like Facebook and X with alternative, decentralized platforms. Key findings emphasize the use of 'Fear Speech' to mobilize new supporters, the diversification of funding through cryptocurrencies and influencer-style memberships, and the role of TikTok in targeting younger audiences through pop-culture integration. The document also discusses the impact of the European Digital Services Act (DSA) and the necessity of interdisciplinary cooperation between researchers, authorities, and financial institutions to disrupt extremist networks.

The report examines the challenges and opportunities for researchers accessing social media data, focusing on the tension between data privacy and the public interest. It analyzes current tools like APIs and transparency reports, evaluates the impact of the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), and proposes the creation of an independent intermediary body to manage researcher accreditation and data access across liberal-democratic states.

The document examines how emerging technologies—decentralised platforms, generative AI, and immersive environments—are exploited by malign actors to spread hate and disinformation. It argues that these technologies converge to amplify existing harms and calls for updated regulatory frameworks, international coordination, and 'Safety by Design' principles to mitigate these risks.