The Fragility of Freedom Online

The report analyzes the surge of online Holocaust denial and distortion after October 7, 2023, highlighting a shift toward 'Holocaust glorification' and the use of Nazi symbolism. It evaluates the effectiveness of social media platforms in moderating such content, finding that while YouTube remains relatively neutral, platforms like X, Gab, and 4chan frequently display denialist content. The document also explores the risks of generative AI in producing photorealistic but distorted historical imagery and the potential for AI to enhance Holocaust education through personalized learning and survivor testimony preservation.

• Following the October 7 Hamas attacks, there has been a significant rise in 'Holocaust glorification,' characterized by the praise of Hitler and the Nazi regime. This is evidenced by the hashtag #HitlerWasRight, which appeared in over 46,000 posts in the month following the attack, representing an 820 percent increase over the previous month.
• Holocaust distortion has manifested through 'inversions of victim and perpetrator,' where Jews or Israelis are depicted as the new Nazis and the conflict in Gaza is equated to the Holocaust. This is often visualized by equating the Star of David with the swastika.
• A study of search results for 'Holocaust' across five platforms in October 2023 found that denial and distortion are frequent on fringe sites like Gab and 4chan. On 4chan, the share of Holocaust denial in top search results rose from about a third at the start of the month to more than half following the October 7 attack.

APA

Bricman, A., Jikeli, G., Baumkötter, A., Pook, L. K., Stanjek, G., Placzynta, K., Barak-Cheney, Y., & Maman, H. (2024). The Fragility of Freedom Online. Institute for Strategic Dialogue. https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/The-Fragility-of-Freedom.pdf

Chicago

Bricman, Alina, Günther Jikeli, Ada Baumkötter, Linus Kebba Pook, Grischa Stanjek, Karolina Placzynta, Yfat Barak-Cheney, and Hannah Maman. The Fragility of Freedom Online. Institute for Strategic Dialogue, 2024. https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/The-Fragility-of-Freedom.pdf.

Wikipedia

{{cite report |last1=Bricman |first1=Alina |last2=Jikeli |first2=Günther |last3=Baumkötter |first3=Ada |last4=Pook |first4=Linus Kebba |last5=Stanjek |first5=Grischa |last6=Placzynta |first6=Karolina |last7=Barak-Cheney |first7=Yfat |last8=Maman |first8=Hannah |title=The Fragility of Freedom Online |publisher=Institute for Strategic Dialogue |date=2024 |url=https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/The-Fragility-of-Freedom.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}

BibTeX

@techreport{bricman2024fragility, author = {Bricman, Alina and Jikeli, Günther and Baumkötter, Ada and Pook, Linus Kebba and Stanjek, Grischa and Placzynta, Karolina and Barak-Cheney, Yfat and Maman, Hannah}, title = {{The Fragility of Freedom Online}}, institution = {Institute for Strategic Dialogue}, year = {2024}, url = {https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/The-Fragility-of-Freedom.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }