Search Climate Insights Directory

The document advocates for the expansion of the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) in London, scheduled for 25 October 2021, to address illegal levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and the resulting public health risks. It highlights that air pollution disproportionately affects vulnerable groups and low-income households, while noting that without such policies, London would have taken 193 years from 2016 to meet legal NO2 limits. The briefing calls for further support through scrappage schemes and a comprehensive plan to tackle pollution hotspots near schools and hospitals.

A coalition of NGOs calls on the European Commission to implement strict area closures to bottom fishing in EU waters to protect deep-sea biodiversity, specifically advocating for a combination of ICES advice scenarios and 'VME elements' to prevent further destruction from bottom trawling.

Civil society organisations are calling on the Finnish government to support the classification of Resorcinol as a substance of very high concern (SVHC) under the REACH regulation. The authors argue that Resorcinol is a known endocrine disruptor that inhibits thyroperoxidase (TPO), affecting thyroid hormone levels essential for brain development. They highlight that the substance is used in high volumes (1,000-10,000 tons/annum) across various industrial and consumer products, posing risks to workers and the public. The letter asserts that Resorcinol meets the 'equivalent level of concern' (ELoC) criteria due to the severity and irreversibility of its developmental effects, such as hypothyroidism and neurological impacts in children.

Civil society organisations are calling on the German government to support the classification of Resorcinol as a substance of very high concern (SVHC) under the REACH regulation. They argue that Resorcinol is a known endocrine disruptor that inhibits thyroperoxidase (TPO), affecting thyroid hormone levels essential for brain development, particularly in unborn children. The authors highlight that Resorcinol is a high-volume compound used in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and rubber products, leading to significant exposure for workers and the public. They contend that the substance meets the 'equivalent level of concern' (ELoC) criteria due to the irreversible nature of its developmental effects, such as hypothyroidism and neurological impacts.

The document argues that Resorcinol should be identified as a substance of very high concern (SVHC) under REACH article 57(f) because it is an endocrine disruptor that inhibits thyroperoxidase (TPO), affecting thyroid hormone levels. The authors highlight severe developmental risks for unborn children, including hypothyroidism and neurological impacts, and note that the substance is a high-volume compound used in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and rubber products. They contend that the substance meets the 'equivalent level of concern' (ELoC) criteria and that failure to identify it would undermine the EU Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability.

A coalition of civil society organisations is calling on the Polish government to support the classification of Resorcinol as a substance of very high concern (SVHC) under the REACH regulation. The organisations argue that Resorcinol is a known endocrine disruptor that inhibits thyroperoxidase (TPO), affecting thyroid hormone levels essential for prenatal brain development. They highlight that the substance is a high-volume compound used in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and rubber products, posing risks to workers and the public. The letter asserts that Resorcinol meets the 'equivalent level of concern' (ELoC) criteria due to the irreversible nature of its developmental effects, such as hypothyroidism and neurological impacts in children.

The document is an open letter to the UK Prime Minister calling for amendments to the Environment Bill to ensure UK supply chains and finance are not complicit in any form of deforestation, regardless of legality in producer countries. The authors argue that the UK must protect the rights of Indigenous Peoples and set a global environmental footprint target by 2030 to support the 1.5°C climate target and protect the Amazon biome.

The document details ten significant court cases across ten different countries—China, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Belgium, Finland, Australia, Tanzania, the Philippines, and India—where legal action successfully protected habitats or species. These cases highlight the application of the precautionary principle, the recognition of the 'rights of nature', and the use of public interest litigation to challenge government inaction or illegal industrial activities. Key outcomes include the halting of a hydroelectric dam in China, the liability of landowners for illegal deforestation in Brazil, and the reintroduction of Asiatic lions in India.

The document outlines ClientEarth's perspective on four key climate priorities: phasing out coal, reducing urban air pollution through Clean Air Zones, mobilising climate finance for developing nations, and implementing a more ambitious legal framework to combat global deforestation.

ClientEarth responds to the FCA's CP21/17 consultation, arguing that while the proposed expansion of climate-related disclosures is welcome, the FCA must broaden the scope of regulated firms, mandate Paris-aligned transition plans, and ensure robust enforcement to meet the UK's net-zero targets.

The document details ten significant legal cases across various countries—including China, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Belgium, Finland, Australia, Tanzania, the Philippines, and India—where courts intervened to protect biodiversity. Key legal strategies highlighted include the application of the precautionary principle, the recognition of nature as a legal subject (rights of nature), the use of public interest litigation, and the enforcement of international treaties like CITES and the EU Habitats Directive. These cases range from stopping hydroelectric projects to protect the green peacock in China and banning neonicotinoid pesticides to save bees in Costa Rica, to mandating the reintroduction of Asiatic lions in India.

The document argues that the EU has failed its legal obligation to end overfishing by 2020 and calls for 2022 Total Allowable Catches (TACs) to be set strictly within scientific advice. It emphasizes the need for a precautionary approach, better implementation of the Landing Obligation, and the prioritization of depleted stocks over short-term economic profit. The authors also urge the EU to ensure that negotiations with third parties, such as the UK and Norway, adhere to the sustainability objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy.

The document argues that 'Big Food' companies face escalating risks across three domains: waste, climate, and health. It highlights the 'Brussels Effect,' where strict EU directives on single-use plastics and chemical safety set global standards. The report warns that failure to transition from linear 'take-make-waste' models to circular reuse systems exposes companies to legal action, financial penalties, and loss of brand value, particularly among millennial and Gen Z consumers.

The document argues that 'Big Food' companies face escalating risks across waste, climate, and health dimensions due to their 'addiction to single-use plastics'. It highlights a wave of new legislation in Europe, increasing public backlash, and emerging legal precedents in the US and EU that could lead to significant financial and legal liabilities. The brief warns investors that many companies are failing to disclose these material risks or are relying on 'false solutions' rather than reducing their plastic footprints.

The proposal outlines a framework for EU State aid in the fishery and aquaculture sectors, aligning financial support with the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), the European Green Deal, and the Paris Agreement. It establishes strict criteria for compatibility, including the 'do no harm' principle, the prohibition of capacity-enhancing subsidies, and the requirement for beneficiaries to comply with EU environmental law. The guidelines detail specific types of compatible aid, such as those for natural disasters, adverse climatic events, and animal disease control, while mandating transparency and ex post evaluations for large aid schemes.

ClientEarth proposes a comprehensive overhaul of the EU Fisheries State Aid Guidelines to integrate strict environmental and climate protections. The document argues that State aid should be conditional on compliance with EU environmental law and the Common Fisheries Policy, specifically calling for a ban on subsidies for new fishing vessels, fossil fuel energy costs, and harmful fishing gear. It suggests introducing a 'greenwashing test' for sustainable seafood claims and requiring 'climate and environment compatibility' assessments for all aid measures to prevent overcapacity and support the transition to a sustainable blue economy.

The document advocates for the inclusion of human rights protections in the EU's upcoming legislation on forest and ecosystem-risk commodities (FERCs). It argues that deforestation is intrinsically linked to human rights abuses, particularly against Indigenous Peoples, and that protecting these rights is essential for effective forest conservation. The briefing proposes a product-based due diligence framework with a 'negligible risk' threshold, mandatory investigation of land tenure and free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC), and rights of redress before EU courts. To demonstrate feasibility, it provides case studies of Brazilian beef supply chains involving JBS and Marfrig, showing that human rights risks can be identified using publicly available digital information.

ClientEarth has submitted a referral request to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) alleging that Carnival plc and Carnival Corporation failed to disclose material climate-related financial risks in their 2020 reporting. The request argues that the companies' reports are vague or entirely silent on climate change, potentially misleading investors and violating Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTRs) and the UK Market Abuse Regulation (UK MAR). ClientEarth specifically challenges Carnival's reliance on Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) as a decarbonisation strategy, noting that such claims are not substantiated in financial statements and ignore methane emissions and the UK Climate Change Committee's findings on biofuels. The referral seeks financial penalties, public censure, and corrective disclosures.

ClientEarth has submitted a referral request to the FCA alleging that Just Eat Takeaway.com N.V. failed to disclose material climate-related risks and impacts in its 2020 Annual Report. The document argues that Just Eat's reporting is vague, potentially misleading, and fails to provide a fair review of its business or its long-term viability in a net-zero economy. Specifically, it highlights the absence of a Paris-aligned transition strategy and inadequate data on the environmental impact of food packaging and digital operations. ClientEarth requests that the FCA impose financial penalties, issue a public censure, and require the company to rectify its reporting deficiencies.

ClientEarth argues that the FCA is failing to enforce existing climate-related reporting rules, leading to a prevalence of 'greenwishing' and misleading disclosures among UK-listed companies. The document highlights specific failures by companies such as Centamin plc, Synthomer plc, and Bodycote plc, where material climate risks are omitted or presented inconsistently. ClientEarth calls for a comprehensive review of company reporting and robust enforcement action to align the FCA's activities with the UK Government's 2050 net-zero commitment and the statutory objectives of protecting consumers and market integrity.