Search Climate Insights Directory

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) filed an appeal on July 9, 2019, against an integrated environmental authorisation (IEA) granted by the Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) to Mineral Sands Resources (Pty) Ltd (MSR). The authorisation allows MSR to extend mining operations at Tormin Mine, affecting ten beaches and inland areas on the Farm Geelwal Karoo 262 and other farms in the Varhynsdorp Magisterial District, Western Cape. The CER argues that the authorisation was granted through an unlawful circumvention of the mining right application process and fails to protect Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs).

This report is an appeal by the Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) against an integrated environmental authorisation (IEA) granted by the Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) to Mineral Sands Resources (Pty) Ltd (MSR). The appeal contests the expansion of mining operations at Tormin Mine, arguing that the authorisation was granted through an unlawful circumvention of the mining right application process and fails to adequately protect Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs).

This document is an Environmental Management Programme (EMPr) prepared by SRK Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd for Mineral Sands Resources (Pty) Ltd (MSR). It is part of a Section 24G application under the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) to rectify unlawful activities at the Tormin Mine, specifically the unauthorized expansion of a processing area and the construction of a process water dam.

This document is an appeal response report regarding an integrated environmental authorisation (IEA) granted by the Department of Mineral Resources to Mineral Sands Resources (Pty) Ltd (MSR) to extend mining operations at Tormin Mine in the Western Cape, South Africa. The appeal, lodged by Associate Professor Merle Sowman, challenges the approval on the grounds that cumulative impacts of multiple mining applications in the area were not considered and that the proposed mitigation measures are vague and unrealistic.

This document is an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report and Environmental Management Programme (EMPr) for the Tormin Mine Extension, prepared by SRK Consulting for MSR. It details the potential environmental impacts of the mine expansion, proposed mitigation measures, and the financial and operational plans for rehabilitation and closure.

This document is an appendix to an Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) for the Tormin Mine Extension, specifically focusing on the potential terrestrial ecology impacts during the construction, operational, and closure phases. It details the assessment of vegetation, fauna, and avifauna, identifying risks such as habitat loss, collisions with powerlines, and soil erosion, while proposing specific mitigation measures to reduce these impacts from high or medium significance to low or insignificant levels.

A letter from Webber Wentzel to the Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy regarding an application under section 96(2) of the MPRDA to suspend a decision to grant a mine extension at Tormin Mine.

This terrestrial ecology EIA report, produced by Simon Todd Consulting in June 2017, assesses the ecological impacts of expanding the Tormin mineral sands mine operated by MSR. The project involves expanding beach mining across ten discrete beaches and implementing inland strip mining on farm Geelwal Karoo 262, alongside infrastructure expansions including a Mineral Separation Plant and a 22 kV powerline.

This document is a summary page from an Issues and Responses report by SRK Consulting regarding the Tormin Mine Extension, detailing environmental assessments, regulatory applications under NEMA, and ecological concerns regarding the Namaqualand Strandveld.

Expert affidavit by Susan Brownlie regarding the proposed expansion of the Tormin Mine by Mineral Sands Resources (Pty) Ltd. The document argues that the expansion poses significant, potentially irreversible risks to a Critical Biodiversity Area (CBA) and an important ecological corridor, asserting that proposed mitigation measures—specifically rehabilitation and 'search and rescue' of species—are inadequate and scientifically unsupported for the Namaqualand Strandveld vegetation type.