Search Climate Insights Directory

The document explains how international law, primarily through the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), protects traditional knowledge and customary sustainable use of biodiversity. It details the obligations of CBD Parties under Articles 8(j) and 10(c), outlines voluntary instruments like the Akwé: Kon Guidelines and the Tkarihwaié:ri Code of Ethical Conduct, and discusses other frameworks such as UNDRIP and ILO 169. The guide highlights opportunities for communities to advocate for broader rights and challenges such as the restrictive 'compatibility' requirements for legal protection.

The document serves as a guide for indigenous peoples and local communities to understand their rights and responsibilities under international frameworks regarding biodiversity. It focuses heavily on the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), particularly Articles 8(j) and 10(c), which mandate that parties respect, preserve, and maintain traditional knowledge and encourage customary use of biological resources. The guide outlines various voluntary instruments, such as the Akwé: Kon Guidelines and the Tkarihwaié:ri Ethical Code of Conduct, and discusses other relevant frameworks from the FAO, ILO, and UN. It also identifies key challenges, such as the restrictive nature of 'compatibility' requirements for conservation and the lack of clarity regarding intellectual property rights.

The document serves as a guide to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), detailing the collective and individual rights of Indigenous peoples, including self-determination and free, prior and informed consent. It outlines the responsibilities of States and the UN, provides criteria for identifying Indigenous peoples, and offers practical avenues for reporting human rights violations through UN mechanisms. The guide specifically highlights the intersection of UNDRIP with biological diversity, conservation, and land rights.

The Access and Benefit-sharing (ABS) Toolkit by Natural Justice is a guide for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in Southern Africa to manage the use of their biological resources and Traditional Knowledge. It explains the ABS process, where users (industry or researchers) obtain consent from providers (communities) to use resources in exchange for monetary or non-monetary benefits. The document emphasizes the use of Biocultural Community Protocols (BCPs) to establish community rules and rights, and details the legal frameworks governing these processes, including the international Nagoya Protocol and South Africa's National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA). It also addresses the role of intellectual property rights, the importance of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), and the necessity of sustainable resource stewardship to prevent biopiracy and biodiversity loss.

Natural Justice provides legal support to Indigenous peoples and local communities in Africa, specifically in South Africa, Namibia, Zimbabwe, Kenya, Benin, Guinea, and Madagascar. The organization focuses on challenging rights infringements related to land, climate change, and extractive projects, and facilitating fair commercial transactions for traditional knowledge. Key initiatives include the development of 'community protocols' to help communities articulate their rights and the production of accessible legal resources, such as 34 national legal reviews and the Living Convention. Natural Justice also engages in international advocacy through the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights and forums like the UNFCCC and CBD.

The document serves as a guide for indigenous communities to understand and utilize the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). It details the historical context of the Declaration, defines 'indigenous peoples' according to international standards, and breaks down the specific individual and collective rights granted under the instrument, including self-determination and free, prior and informed consent. The guide also outlines the responsibilities of States and the UN, provides examples of national and regional implementation, and offers practical pathways for reporting human rights violations through UN mechanisms.

The Vhavenḓa Biocultural Community Protocol is a collective document representing eleven indigenous communities in the Vhembe District of Limpopo, South Africa. It defines 'Zwifho' as sacred natural sites—including forests, lakes, and caves—that serve as the spiritual and cultural heart of the people. The document outlines the profound connection between the Vhavenḓa identity and their land, detailing the traditional governance structures led by royal families and the spiritual role of the Makhadzi. It highlights severe challenges, including forced removals during colonialism and apartheid, restricted access to ancestral sites by commercial farmers, and the threat of industrial development such as the Musina Makhado Special Economic Zone (MMSEZ). The protocol asserts the communities' rights to self-determination and Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) regarding any development on their territories. It includes a comprehensive biodiversity register and an inventory of intangible cultural heritage, ranging from rain-making rituals to traditional craftsmanship, as a means of preserving their way of life for future generations.

The Vhavenda Biocultural Community Protocol is a community-led framework designed to safeguard the sacred natural sites (Zwifho), indigenous knowledge systems, and land rights of 11 Vhavenda communities. It documents the spiritual and ecological significance of these sites, outlines traditional governance structures, and asserts the communities' right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) regarding any development on their ancestral lands. The protocol highlights threats from industrial development, such as the Musina-Makhado Special Economic Zone, and climate change, while calling for the restoration of land and the protection of intangible cultural heritage.

The report argues that climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is only effective when it addresses gender inequalities that make women more vulnerable to climate change and hinder their adoption of sustainable practices. It highlights that women often face barriers such as insecure land tenure, limited capital, and restrictive social norms. Through case studies in countries like Kenya, Ghana, and Uganda, the document demonstrates that successful interventions require a combination of enhancing women's agency (through training and knowledge networks), reforming institutional structures (securing land and credit rights), and transforming gender relations (encouraging male support and shared decision-making). Specific examples include the use of biogas digesters to reduce women's domestic workloads and the implementation of 'climate analogue' visits to share adaptation strategies.

Dr. Juan Declet-Barreto highlights that nations with the lowest contributions to the climate crisis, particularly in the Global South and Small Islands, suffer disproportionately due to exposure and inequitable development. He asserts that marginalized groups based on income, race, ethnicity, gender, or colonization will continue to face the most severe losses and damages. He calls for policymakers to prioritize equitable solutions, integrate Indigenous and local knowledge, and demands that wealthy nations, specifically the United States, provide financial reparations for historic emissions.

The document identifies seven key principles for water adaptation: gender, equity, and social justice; inclusion of Indigenous and local knowledge; participative and bottom-up engagement; access to appropriate technologies; adequate finance; effective water governance; and strong political support. It emphasizes that climate change impacts are primarily experienced through the water cycle, manifesting as more frequent and intense droughts, storms, and flooding, which threaten health, food security, and political stability.

Wild kelp forests provide critical ecosystem services, including carbon sequestration, coastal protection, and support for global food security and biodiversity.

The research establishes a correlation between gender inequality and lower environmental wellbeing, noting that women's leadership in natural resource management improves governance and environmental outcomes. However, significant gaps persist, including a lack of gender-disaggregated environmental data and the underrepresentation of men and masculinity in conservation literature. The document highlights the critical role of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs), noting that while Indigenous-managed territories show better ecosystem health, Indigenous women are often excluded from decision-making. It recommends shifting power and funding from Global North organizations to local, women-led, and Indigenous organizations, and calls for the 2022 UN Convention on Biological Diversity COP15 to adopt a gender-responsive Global Biodiversity Framework.

The document advocates for a 'nature positive' approach to ocean conservation, aiming to reverse nature loss from a 2020 baseline so that recovery is visible by 2030 and ecosystems are thriving by 2050. It highlights that 66% of marine environments have been severely altered by human actions and emphasizes the need for systemic transformation involving governments, financial institutions, and Indigenous peoples to move from mitigating harm to regenerating biodiversity.

The document argues that interdisciplinary knowledge gaps, limited technical capacity, and inadequate monitoring tools are major barriers to the adoption of nature-based solutions (NbS) for climate adaptation. It highlights a significant lack of evidence and technical expertise in developing countries, noting that 60% of a global analysis of NbS case studies for natural hazard reduction were located in Europe. Key barriers include a shortage of trained professionals, limited access to geospatial technology, and the failure to integrate indigenous knowledge. These gaps make it difficult to build business cases for NbS, leading to a continued reliance on conventional engineered infrastructure.