Search Climate Insights Directory

The WRI/WBCSD guide serves as an information support tool for procurement managers to address sustainability, legality, and social implications in wood and paper supply chains.

The Corporate Ecosystem Services Review (ESR) is a strategic tool developed by the World Resources Institute, the Meridian Institute, and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development. It provides a five-step methodology for companies to assess how ecosystem degradation—which has seen 15 of 24 evaluated services decline over the last 50 years—affects their bottom line. The ESR identifies five categories of risks and opportunities: operational, regulatory and legal, reputational, market and product, and financing. By 2012, approximately 300 companies had utilized the ESR to move beyond traditional pollution-focused environmental assessments toward a strategy that accounts for ecosystem dependence.

The document provides a comparative analysis of climate policy tools in the US and China. It details the US's reliance on subnational carbon pricing and evolving SEC disclosure rules, and China's implementation of the world's largest emissions trading system (ETS) and its 'common but differentiated responsibilities' approach to international finance. It concludes by suggesting cooperation on sustainable procurement, emission accounting standards, and subnational carbon market exchanges.

The briefing examines the climate policy landscapes of the U.S. and China, noting that while the U.S. lacks a national carbon price, it has significant subnational activity. China has established the world's largest emissions trading scheme (ETS) but maintains that it is not obligated to provide international climate finance as a developing nation. Both countries are advancing corporate climate disclosure rules, though they differ on the requirement for Scope 3 emissions. The paper suggests cooperation on sustainable procurement, data standards for emission accounting, and subnational carbon market exchanges.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to responsible travel, emphasizing the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the protection of biodiversity, and the support of local economies. It provides specific criteria for selecting sustainable destinations and travel companies, such as GSTC accreditation and Science Based Net-Zero targets, while offering practical advice on reducing plastic waste and respecting local cultures.

A WWF study of 46 US schools found that students waste an average of 39.2 pounds of food and 28.7 cartons of milk annually. This translates to an estimated $1.7 billion in national annual losses. The report highlights that milk waste is particularly high due to misconceptions about USDA reimbursement rules and the use of cartons over dispensers. It proposes that reducing waste—even by a conservative 3%—could provide significant funding for initiatives like Farm to School (F2S) and the Good Food Purchasing Program (GFPP), which improve student nutrition and support local economies.

The report argues that transitioning to bulk milk dispensers (BMDs) in K-12 schools can significantly reduce packaging and liquid milk waste, lower waste hauling and refrigeration costs, and decrease greenhouse gas emissions. While initial startup costs and labor for cleaning reusable cups are primary hurdles, case studies indicate that these costs can be recouped through reduced waste and improved efficiency. The document highlights that BMDs can lower milk waste from roughly 32 cartons per student to 4.5 cartons per student annually, contributing to broader school sustainability goals.