Search Climate Insights Directory

The report by Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) examines the American Physical Society's (APS) financial practices, noting a lack of transparency regarding $181.9 million in securities and the absence of a formal ethical investment or environmental policy. While the APS has no known fossil fuel sponsors and has committed to tackling the climate crisis, SGR expresses concern over donations from the arms trade and the inability to verify if APS investments contradict its public climate statements.

The report examines the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), finding that while the organization promotes sustainable engineering in its ethics code and conferences, it lacks transparency regarding its $2.55 million investment portfolio. Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) highlights that ASEE accepts significant funding from fossil fuel company Chevron as a "Champion Partner" and arms company Boeing as a "Contributing Partner." SGR argues that these ties contradict the goals of the Paris Agreement and pose financial and reputational risks, urging a transition toward renewable energy investments and the divestment of fossil fuel patrons.

The report examines the American Statistical Association's (ASA) financial ties to the fossil fuel industry and its public stance on climate change. While the ASA has endorsed the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change and lacks evidence of direct corporate sponsorship from fossil fuel companies, it holds $21.9 million in publicly traded securities without a public ethical investment policy or disclosure of where these funds are held. Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) argues that this lack of transparency makes it impossible to rule out investments in fossil fuels, which would contradict the ASA's own ethical guidelines and the goals of the Paris Agreement.

The report by Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) examines the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), highlighting a lack of transparency regarding its CA$3.77m in investments and the absence of an ethical investment policy. SGR identifies financial links between CIM and fossil fuel firms Syncrude and Teck Resources, noting that Teck served as a 'Gold sponsor' for CIM's 2021 Convention with a donation of CA$20,000-30,000. While CIM partners with the Mining Association of Canada on the 'Towards Sustainable Mining' standard, SGR argues that CIM's ties to companies not aligned with 1.5C warming limits undermine its stated goal of 'Collaborating towards a sustainable future'.

The report by Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) examines the Institution of Engineers Australia's (EA) financial transparency and climate alignment. While SGR notes the EA's sustainability policies and public support for climate action, it highlights a lack of transparency regarding A$16.3 million in investments managed by Morgan Stanley, making it impossible to verify if the funds include fossil fuel companies. SGR argues that any such indirect investments would contradict the EA's public commitment to decarbonization and the goals of the Paris Agreement.

The report by Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) examines the Institution of Chemical Engineers (IChemE), noting that while the organization has committed to net zero operations by 2025 and alignment with climate goals, it maintains 'gold corporate partners' including BP, ExxonMobil, and Shell. SGR criticizes IChemE for a lack of transparency regarding its £6.09m investment portfolio and urges the institution to divest from fossil fuel companies to align with the 1.5°C warming limit and avoid financial and reputational risks.

The report by Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) examines the American Astronomical Society's (AAS) financial ties and sustainability policies. While the AAS has a Sustainability Committee and a LEED-certified building, SGR highlights a lack of transparency regarding $14.5 million in publicly traded securities and the acceptance of sponsorships from arms manufacturers such as Northrop Grumman, L3Harris, and Ball Technologies.

The report by Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) evaluates the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), noting that while the organization promotes sustainability and climate change mitigation through policy statements and committees, it lacks transparency regarding its $55.4 million in publicly traded securities. SGR expresses concern that the absence of an ethical investment policy may mean ASCE holds funds in the fossil fuel industry, which would contradict its climate goals. Additionally, the report identifies Boeing, an arms manufacturer, as a partner of the ASCE since 2006.

The report by Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) examines the Geological Society of America's (GSA) financial relationships with fossil fuel companies and its lack of investment transparency. While acknowledging GSA's public support for climate action, SGR highlights contradictions between GSA's position statements and its acceptance of sponsorships from companies like ExxonMobil and Chevron, which do not align with 2°C warming limits. SGR argues that GSA's failure to disclose specific investments and its reliance on fossil fuel funding undermine its role as a scientific thought-leader and calls for divestment to support a transition to renewable energy.

The document examines the shift toward sustainable investing among US institutional investors, such as foundations and endowments. While financial materiality and policy frameworks like the Paris Agreement are driving interest, significant barriers remain, including short-term biases, misconceptions about fiduciary duty, and a lack of standardized ESG data. The paper outlines five primary sustainable investing strategies and suggests that asset owners begin with internal capacity building and portfolio experimentation to navigate the landscape.

The document outlines a strategic framework for banks, specifically targeting Chinese institutions, to exit coal financing. It emphasizes that global coal combustion for power must drop from 36% in 2022 to 3% by 2035 to maintain the 1.5°C goal. The proposed framework consists of three stages: plan/review, decide, and implement, designed to increase transparency and manage risks across the entire coal value chain. The author argues that adopting these practices and collaborating internationally will provide Chinese banks with a competitive edge during the global energy transition.

WRI is implementing a climate change investment strategy to transition its portfolio to net-zero GHG emissions by 2050, aiming for alignment with a 1.5°C future. The strategy is based on five objectives: identifying material climate issues, reducing climate-related risk, increasing investments in a low-carbon transition, conducting climate-focused engagement, and disclosing progress. Key actions include maintaining 0% exposure to fossil fuel companies and increasing private equity commitments to sustainable investments to 15% of the portfolio by 2022.

WRI's Climate Change Investment Statement establishes a framework to transition its endowment portfolio to net-zero GHG emissions by 2050, aiming for alignment with a 1.5°C future. The strategy is built on five objectives: identifying material climate issues, reducing risk exposure, investing in low-carbon and just transition solutions, engaging with companies and managers, and disclosing progress. Key quantitative targets include the total divestment of thermal coal, oil, and gas reserves by April 2020 and increasing private market commitments to sustainable-development-aligned investments to 15% of the portfolio by 2022.