Search Climate Insights Directory

The document presents a compilation of quotes from various stakeholder groups—including Development Finance Institutions (DFIs), IFC clients, Independent Accountability Mechanisms (IAMs), and civil society—who collectively argue that the IFC/MIGA's proposed Approach to Remedial Action and Responsible Exit Principles fails to provide new commitments or sufficient clarity. Stakeholders emphasize that the IFC/MIGA should take a more active role in remediating harm, align with international human rights standards, and establish a dedicated remedy fund. There is a strong consensus that the current approach ignores 'legacy' cases and fails to adequately address the risks to project-affected people and the environment, particularly during the process of 'responsible exit'.

The Government of Canada's proposal for a Clean Fuel Standard (CFS) received strong stakeholder support, with broad agreement on the necessity of contributions from all economic sectors to meet national emission reduction targets.

The document summarizes over 125 written submissions and workshop contributions regarding the proposed Canadian Clean Fuel Standard (CFS). Stakeholders generally support the CFS's goal of reducing GHG emissions by 30 Mt annually by 2030, though they diverge on the feasibility of the timeline and the specific regulatory design. Key areas of discussion include the preference for an emission intensity-based approach over volumetric mandates, the need for flexible compliance pathways such as credit trading, and the importance of harmonizing the CFS with existing carbon pricing and international aviation and marine standards. Industrial sectors expressed significant concerns regarding competitiveness, carbon leakage, and the technical feasibility of fuel switching, while environmental groups advocated for broad sustainability criteria and the inclusion of indirect land use changes (iLUC) in life-cycle analyses.

The document summarizes stakeholder responses to Canada's proposed Clean Fuel Standard (CFS). While there is broad support for the goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 30 Mt by 2030, stakeholders express divergent views on regulatory design, specifically regarding sector-specific targets, the inclusion of indirect land-use change (ILUC) in life-cycle assessments, and the potential for policy duplication with carbon pricing. Key concerns include the economic impact on trade-exposed industries, the feasibility of infrastructure for low-carbon fuels, and the need for harmonization with international standards in aviation and shipping.

The document outlines the tension between a 'narrow view' of internet governance, focused on critical internet resources, and a 'broader view' that links technical decisions to development outcomes. It details the proposed agenda for the 2008 Hyderabad meeting, specifically the 'Reaching the next billion' theme, and highlights the role of Dynamic Coalitions in addressing the digital divide, human rights, and linguistic diversity. The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) specifically argues for the inextricable link between internet evolution and global sustainability.