WWF Groundwater platform: Usability Testing Report – iComms

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The usability testing of the WWF groundwater dashboard revealed that while users value the tool's data, the interface is often overwhelming and difficult to navigate for non-experts. Key issues include inconsistent fonts, a lack of clear purpose on the landing page, confusing map layers, and an excessive amount of text. Recommendations include creating separate user profiles for experts and non-experts, implementing color-coded severity indicators for groundwater levels, and adding tutorials to guide new users.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The dashboard is perceived as a valuable tool for researchers, policymakers, and academics, but it is considered too advanced for the general public.
  • Users found the landing page unwelcoming and lacking in clarity, noting that it does not communicate the platform's purpose and contains inconsistent font styles and sizes.
  • Navigation of the map system was confusing due to the presence of three different maps, unclear drawing tool icons, and a lack of understanding regarding the role of map layers.
  • The interface contains an overwhelming amount of text and a lack of visuals, leading some users to skip sections of the dashboard background entirely.
  • There is a lack of clear information regarding the ownership of the dashboard and the origins of the data, with no indication that the platform is currently a pilot study.
  • The registration and login process is viewed as a potential barrier for users who only need to access information rather than manage it.
  • Participants suggested that numeric data alone is insufficient for non-experts and recommended using color codes (e.g., green, yellow, red) to indicate the severity of groundwater levels and quality.

Cite the original document

APA
WWF South Africa (n.d.). WWF Groundwater platform: Usability Testing Report – iComms. https://wwfafrica.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/4_annexure_4_appendix_b_usability_testing_report.pdf
Chicago
WWF South Africa. WWF Groundwater platform: Usability Testing Report – iComms. n.d. https://wwfafrica.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/4_annexure_4_appendix_b_usability_testing_report.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=WWF South Africa |title=WWF Groundwater platform: Usability Testing Report – iComms |url=https://wwfafrica.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/4_annexure_4_appendix_b_usability_testing_report.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{wwfsouthafricandwwf, author = {{WWF South Africa}}, title = {{WWF Groundwater platform: Usability Testing Report – iComms}}, institution = {WWF South Africa}, url = {https://wwfafrica.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/4_annexure_4_appendix_b_usability_testing_report.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated