Browse all documents

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This research paper examines the role of economic valuation in improving the understanding and implementation of Watershed Development (WSD) in India. Using a case study of a project in Maharashtra implemented by the Watershed Organisation Trust (WOTR), the paper demonstrates the potential for positive net present value and benefit-cost ratios in WSD, while highlighting significant gaps in data consistency and the under-valuation of non-market co-benefits and climate change adaptation.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • A benefit-cost analysis (BCA) of a WSD project in the Kumbharwadi watershed of Maharashtra indicated a positive investment for 171 households, with a net present value between $5.08 and $7.43 million over 15 years and a benefit-cost ratio of 2.3 to 3.8. These figures specifically account for avoided costs of government-supplied water tankers, travel for water and fuel, and improvements in livestock and agricultural income.
  • Beyond direct agricultural and livestock gains, tree planting in the Kumbharwadi watershed is estimated to have provided carbon sequestration benefits valued at $1 to $1.4 million. Other unvalued co-benefits identified due to data constraints include female empowerment via 11 self-help groups managing micro-credit, improved nutrition and health, increased school enrollment, habitat and biodiversity improvements, and enhanced community coordination.
  • Economic valuations of WSD face several data collection hurdles, including a lack of consistency in reporting social, economic, and environmental indicators among implementing agencies and inconsistent collection methods across different actors. Furthermore, there is insufficient acknowledgment of non-market co-benefits and a lack of post-project assessments to verify if benefits contribute to long-term drought resilience.
  • The paper recommends that economic valuations for WSD and Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) should leverage community participation for data collection and consider the distribution of benefits across genders, economic classes, and on-farm versus off-farm stakeholders. It also calls for funders and researchers to provide guidance to standardize reporting protocols and data collection for implementing agencies.
  • Since the 1970s, WSD in India has aimed to alleviate poverty and increase agricultural production in rainfed regions by restoring degraded watersheds to improve rainwater storage, soil nutrients, and carbon content. However, a lack of rigorous and consistent evaluation has left practitioners without a clear understanding of the overall effectiveness of these programs regarding food security and poverty alleviation.

Cite the original document

APA
World Resources Institute (n.d.). Watershed Development in India. https://www.wri.org/research/watershed-development-india
Chicago
World Resources Institute. Watershed Development in India. n.d. https://www.wri.org/research/watershed-development-india.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=World Resources Institute |title=Watershed Development in India |url=https://www.wri.org/research/watershed-development-india |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{worldresourcesinstitutendwatershed, author = {{World Resources Institute}}, title = {{Watershed Development in India}}, institution = {World Resources Institute}, url = {https://www.wri.org/research/watershed-development-india}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated