Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The paper examines the role of economic valuation in Watershed Development (WSD) in India, using a benefit-cost analysis (BCA) of a project in Maharashtra to demonstrate positive returns. It identifies significant gaps in data consistency and the failure to value non-market co-benefits, while providing recommendations for integrating economic valuation into climate change adaptation (CCA) strategies.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • A benefit-cost analysis of a WSD project in the Kumbharwadi watershed of Maharashtra showed a positive investment for 171 households, with a net present value between $5.08 and $7.43 million over 15 years and a benefit-cost ratio of 2.3 to 3.8. These figures specifically account for livestock and agricultural income improvements and avoided costs for water tankers, fuel, and water travel.
  • Tree planting within the Kumbharwadi watershed project generated carbon sequestration benefits estimated at $1 to $1.4 million.
  • Several co-benefits of WSD were not economically valued due to data constraints, including improvements in human health, nutrition, dietary diversity, habitat, biodiversity, and school enrollment. Other unvalued benefits included female empowerment via 11 self-help groups managing micro-credit loans, increased resilience to temperature fluctuations and drought, and reduced transaction costs and conflicts through better community coordination.
  • Economic valuation of WSD is hindered by several data collection challenges: inconsistent reporting of economic, environmental, and social indicators by agencies; inconsistent collection methods across different impact assessment actors; a failure to acknowledge non-market co-benefits; and a lack of post-project assessments to verify long-term resilience benefits.
  • To improve climate change adaptation (CCA) interventions, the paper recommends that economic valuations leverage community participation, consider the distribution of benefits across genders and economic classes, and include both market and non-market benefits. Furthermore, funders and researchers should provide guidance to standardize reporting protocols and data collection for implementing agencies.

Cite the original document

APA
World Resources Institute (n.d.). Watershed Development in India. https://www.wri.org/research/watershed-development-india
Chicago
World Resources Institute. Watershed Development in India. n.d. https://www.wri.org/research/watershed-development-india.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=World Resources Institute |title=Watershed Development in India |url=https://www.wri.org/research/watershed-development-india |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{worldresourcesinstitutendwatershed, author = {{World Resources Institute}}, title = {{Watershed Development in India}}, institution = {World Resources Institute}, url = {https://www.wri.org/research/watershed-development-india}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated