DAPAT MENDORONG TRANSISI ENERGI INDONESIA YANG ADIL DAN AMBISIUS? APAKAH RENCANA DAN KEBIJAKAN INVESTASI JETP

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document critiques the implementation of the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) in Indonesia, highlighting a lack of transparency in the Comprehensive Investment and Policy Plan (CIPP) and the persistence of 'false solutions' like coal co-firing and carbon capture. It argues that for a transition to be truly 'just,' it must incorporate four pillars of justice—recognition, distributive, procedural, and restorative—and specifically address the vulnerability of workers in the coal sector. The report recommends legally binding emission targets, the removal of 'take-or-pay' electricity contracts, and the decentralization of renewable energy development to empower local governments and communities.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The JETP agreement between Indonesia and the International Partners Group (IPG) committed USD 20 billion to support a transition aiming for power sector emissions to peak by 2030 at no more than 290 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent and reaching net zero by 2050.
  • The report identifies several 'false solutions' that prolong fossil fuel use, including biomass co-firing, coal downstreaming (gasification and liquefaction), and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), which it claims are often inefficient or economically unviable without subsidies.
  • The energy transition poses a high risk to employment; an estimated 165,784 coal mining workers, 54,129 PLN employees, and 150,000 power plant workers would be directly impacted by the early retirement of coal-fired power plants.
  • The report argues that the 'Green Taxonomy' issued by the OJK is problematic because it has classified certain coal activities as 'yellow' (transition), which the authors claim supports greenwashing and may deter international investors.
  • To achieve a just transition, the report proposes four pillars of justice: recognition (acknowledging vulnerable groups), distributive (fair distribution of benefits and burdens), procedural (meaningful participation in decision-making), and restorative (remedying past harms).
  • The report recommends the abolition of 'take-or-pay' schemes in electricity purchase agreements, as these force PLN to prioritize expensive IPP coal plants over renewable energy sources.

Cite the original document

APA
Trend Asia (2023). DAPAT MENDORONG TRANSISI ENERGI INDONESIA YANG ADIL DAN AMBISIUS? APAKAH RENCANA DAN KEBIJAKAN INVESTASI JETP. https://trendasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/White-Paper-Ind-.pdf
Chicago
Trend Asia. DAPAT MENDORONG TRANSISI ENERGI INDONESIA YANG ADIL DAN AMBISIUS? APAKAH RENCANA DAN KEBIJAKAN INVESTASI JETP. 2023. https://trendasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/White-Paper-Ind-.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Trend Asia |title=DAPAT MENDORONG TRANSISI ENERGI INDONESIA YANG ADIL DAN AMBISIUS? APAKAH RENCANA DAN KEBIJAKAN INVESTASI JETP |date=October 2023 |url=https://trendasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/White-Paper-Ind-.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{trendasia2023dapat, author = {{Trend Asia}}, title = {{DAPAT MENDORONG TRANSISI ENERGI INDONESIA YANG ADIL DAN AMBISIUS? APAKAH RENCANA DAN KEBIJAKAN INVESTASI JETP}}, institution = {Trend Asia}, year = {2023}, month = oct, url = {https://trendasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/White-Paper-Ind-.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated