Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document analyzes coal finance in 18 high-impact countries (HICs) in South Asia and Africa, highlighting that while global trends shift toward renewables, significant coal investment persists, largely driven by Chinese state-owned institutions. It argues that coal is an inefficient path to universal electricity access compared to distributed renewables and warns of stranded asset risks, citing overcapacity in Bangladesh and Pakistan.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Between 2013 and 2019, financial institutions based in China provided 40 percent of the total USD 42 billion in finance committed to coal-fired power plants in the 18 analyzed high-impact countries (HICs).
  • India is the primary driver of coal capacity expansion among HICs, hosting 87 percent of the total coal generation pipeline currently under active development.
  • International public finance has been the dominant source of funding for new coal-fired power plants in HICs since 2013, contrasting with renewable energy projects where nearly 60 percent of finance came from domestic private investors.
  • Bangladesh and Pakistan face significant stranded asset risks due to coal plant underutilization; Bangladesh's coal generating capacity utilization was under 30 percent in FY 2018-2019 and FY 2019-2020, while Pakistan's total thermal capacity utilization was 40 percent in FY 2018-2019.
  • The governments of Pakistan and Bangladesh have incurred massive costs through capacity payments to idle coal plants, totaling USD 5.3 billion and USD 1.1 billion respectively in 2018.
  • Coal development in Sub-Saharan African HICs has a very high failure rate; of 20 GW of planned coal projects, 18.1 GW have been shelved or cancelled, leaving only 1.9 GW under development.
  • Chinese coal finance to HICs is partly driven by a desire to export surplus domestic capacity and provide jobs for Chinese workers, often utilizing outdated subcritical technology that is less common in China's own domestic projects.
  • Distributed renewable energy is identified as the most efficient path to achieving Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7) universal access by 2030 because thermal power plants have long development timelines and require costly high-voltage transmission infrastructure.

Cite the original document

APA
Sustainable Energy for All (2021). COAL POWER FINANCE IN HIGH-IMPACT COUNTRIES. https://www.seforall.org/system/files/2022-08/EF-Coal_Finance-SEforALL.pdf
Chicago
Sustainable Energy for All. COAL POWER FINANCE IN HIGH-IMPACT COUNTRIES. 2021. https://www.seforall.org/system/files/2022-08/EF-Coal_Finance-SEforALL.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Sustainable Energy for All |title=COAL POWER FINANCE IN HIGH-IMPACT COUNTRIES |date=September 2021 |url=https://www.seforall.org/system/files/2022-08/EF-Coal_Finance-SEforALL.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{sustainableenergyforall2021coal, author = {{Sustainable Energy for All}}, title = {{COAL POWER FINANCE IN HIGH-IMPACT COUNTRIES}}, institution = {Sustainable Energy for All}, year = {2021}, month = sep, url = {https://www.seforall.org/system/files/2022-08/EF-Coal_Finance-SEforALL.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated