South Africa and the DRC: Evaluating a South–South Partnership for Peace, Governance and Development

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The study evaluates the South Africa–DRC development partnership, finding that South Africa is a significant partner in absolute financial terms and relative to its gross national income. While the partnership aligns with SSC values of national ownership and non-conditionality, it suffers from fragmented coordination, weak monitoring and evaluation systems, and a lack of clear strategic intent from the South African side.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Between 2001 and 2015, South Africa spent at least ZAR 8.5 billion (over $1 billion) on official South-South cooperation (SSC) activities in the DRC through various government departments and public entities.
  • In 2008, South Africa was the third largest development partner to the DRC in absolute terms, spending approximately $181 million (ZAR 1.5 billion), surpassing Belgium and nearly equaling the UK's DFID.
  • When measured as a percentage of gross national income (GNI), South Africa's international development efforts in the DRC exceed those of most OECD-DAC donors.
  • South Africa's support to the DRC is characterized as demand-driven and non-conditional, often responding ad hoc to requests from Kinshasa and respecting national sovereignty, sometimes at the expense of its own constitutional values regarding human rights and term limits.
  • The partnership is marked by a lack of internal coordination and strategic focus on the South African side, with development assistance provided in a fragmented manner across different agencies.
  • Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems for South Africa's SSC are extremely weak, with a lack of basic documentation and a central information hub, which limits accountability and the use of soft power.
  • South Africa provides significant technical and capacity-building support in governance, police training, and electoral logistics, including the distribution of 1,863 tonnes of electoral material for the 2006 and 2011 elections.
  • The Grand Inga hydroelectric power project is a key strategic energy engagement, with a treaty committing South Africa to off-take 2,500MW of power, though the project has faced political and technical delays.
  • While South Africa is viewed as a trusted 'honest broker' by the DRC government, the relationship is described as a 'win-win in favour of the DRC,' as South Africa's gains from the partnership are less clear.
  • Domestic South African policies, specifically tightening visa restrictions and xenophobic outbreaks, create incoherence with its foreign policy goal of African integration and negatively impact SSC quality.

Cite the original document

APA
Alessandro, N., & Rawhani, B. C. (2016). South Africa and the DRC: Evaluating a South–South Partnership for Peace, Governance and Development. South African Institute of International Affairs. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Occasional-Paper-235.pdf
Chicago
Alessandro, Neissan, and Besharati Carmel Rawhani. South Africa and the DRC: Evaluating a South–South Partnership for Peace, Governance and Development. South African Institute of International Affairs, 2016. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Occasional-Paper-235.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Alessandro |first1=Neissan |last2=Rawhani |first2=Besharati Carmel |title=South Africa and the DRC: Evaluating a South–South Partnership for Peace, Governance and Development |publisher=South African Institute of International Affairs |date=July 2016 |url=https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Occasional-Paper-235.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{alessandro2016south, author = {Alessandro, Neissan and Rawhani, Besharati Carmel}, title = {{South Africa and the DRC: Evaluating a South–South Partnership for Peace, Governance and Development}}, institution = {South African Institute of International Affairs}, year = {2016}, month = jul, url = {https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Occasional-Paper-235.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated