Browse all documents

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This case study examines the challenges and mechanisms for financing infrastructure in Africa, with a specific focus on the Southern African Development Community (SADC). It analyzes the shift from official development assistance and commercial bank lending toward alternative funding modalities, including Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs), infrastructure bonds, sovereign wealth funds, and diaspora-led financing, to meet the massive capital requirements of regional development plans.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The Southern African Development Community (SADC) Regional Infrastructure Development Master Plan (RIDMP), adopted in August 2012, requires an estimated $500 billion in capital, with $100 billion expected from private-sector sources for implementation between 2014 and 2027.
  • Infrastructure costs in sub-Saharan Africa are significantly higher than in other developing countries, with power tariffs up to 460% more expensive, road freight tariffs 350% higher, and water tariffs up to 1,093% higher.
  • Project preparation in Africa is costly and often insufficient, with the OECD estimating that preparation costs average between 5% and 10% of total project costs.
  • Private investment in African infrastructure has lagged behind other regions; between 1990 and 2011, only 10% of global private investment flowed to infrastructure in Africa, compared to 40% in Latin America.
  • Financial markets in Southern Africa are underdeveloped, characterized by a lack of medium- to long-term lending and weak regulatory frameworks, with the exception of South Africa.
  • China provides infrastructure funding to sub-Saharan African countries through low-interest, concessional loans and oil-for-infrastructure deals via the China Export–Import Bank and China Development Bank, often without the conditionality required by Western banks.
  • There is significant untapped potential in diaspora financing for sub-Saharan Africa, with estimates suggesting countries could raise $3 billion by reducing remittance costs, $5–10 billion through diaspora bonds, and $17 billion by securitising future remittances.

Cite the original document

APA
Wentworth, L. (2013). Financing of Infrastructure. South African Institute of International Affairs. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/REV_SAIIA_perisa_infr_wentworth_financing_20131213.pdf
Chicago
Wentworth, Lesley. Financing of Infrastructure. South African Institute of International Affairs, 2013. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/REV_SAIIA_perisa_infr_wentworth_financing_20131213.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Wentworth |first1=Lesley |title=Financing of Infrastructure |publisher=South African Institute of International Affairs |date=August 2013 |url=https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/REV_SAIIA_perisa_infr_wentworth_financing_20131213.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{wentworth2013financing, author = {Wentworth, Lesley}, title = {{Financing of Infrastructure}}, institution = {South African Institute of International Affairs}, year = {2013}, month = aug, url = {https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/REV_SAIIA_perisa_infr_wentworth_financing_20131213.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated