THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF AUSTRALIA’S TRADE AND ECONOMIC REFORMS: PROCESS AND LESSONS
Summary
This research paper by Bill Bowen analyzes the political economy of Australia's unilateral trade and economic reforms from the 1970s through the early 2000s. It examines how the country transitioned from a highly protected 'fixed price country' to a competitive global economy, highlighting the roles of independent research bodies, political leadership, and social compensation mechanisms. The document is intended to provide lessons for South Africa as it considers similar reform paths.
Key insights
- In the 1970s and early 1980s, Australia was characterized as a "fixed price country" due to structural rigidities that led to high inflation, rising unemployment, low productivity, and a "pessimistic siege mentality" regarding globalization and competition from East Asia.
- The Tariff Board and its successor organizations—the Industries Assistance Commission and the Productivity Commission—were pivotal in dismantling protection by systematically identifying and publicizing the costs of industry assistance, thereby stripping away the secrecy that sustained protectionism.
- The Hawke and Keating governments implemented a strategy of unilateral trade liberalization, opting for successive, small, and pre-announced tariff reductions rather than sudden cuts, which helped manage adjustment costs.
- A critical factor in gaining public acceptance for reform was the use of high-profile political communication, such as Paul Keating's 1986 "banana republic" statement, which alerted the public to the country's economic predicament and the unsustainability of its current account deficit.
- To maintain social cohesion during reform, the Australian government established labor adjustment programs, including relocation, training, and wage subsidies for displaced workers in the automotive and textiles, clothing, and footwear industries, costing at least $90 million.
- The Prices and Incomes Accord between the government and trade unions helped break wage inflation by persuading workers to accept restraint in nominal wages in exchange for improvements in the "social wage," such as health and education.
- The dismantling of protection was supported by complementary microeconomic reforms, including the floating of the dollar and financial system deregulation in 1983, as well as later reforms in competition policy for inputs like gas and electricity.
- The author concludes that successful unilateral reform requires a combination of independent analysis of protection costs, media engagement to educate the public, political courage to implement changes, and a consensus on compensating those adversely affected.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Bowen, B. (n.d.). THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF AUSTRALIA’S TRADE AND ECONOMIC REFORMS: PROCESS AND LESSONS. South African Institute of International Affairs. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/dttp_pap_bowen_australia_20071307.pdf
- Chicago
- Bowen, Bill. THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF AUSTRALIA’S TRADE AND ECONOMIC REFORMS: PROCESS AND LESSONS. South African Institute of International Affairs, n.d. https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/dttp_pap_bowen_australia_20071307.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=Bowen |first1=Bill |title=THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF AUSTRALIA’S TRADE AND ECONOMIC REFORMS: PROCESS AND LESSONS |publisher=South African Institute of International Affairs |url=https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/dttp_pap_bowen_australia_20071307.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{bowenndpolitical, author = {Bowen, Bill}, title = {{THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF AUSTRALIA’S TRADE AND ECONOMIC REFORMS: PROCESS AND LESSONS}}, institution = {South African Institute of International Affairs}, url = {https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/dttp_pap_bowen_australia_20071307.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated