Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document outlines the structural, sociocultural, and physical risks women face when participating in peace mediation, arguing that traditional security frameworks often overlook these gender-specific vulnerabilities. It highlights risks ranging from exclusion in pre-negotiations and reputational attacks to digital divide issues and psychological trauma. The briefing concludes that meaningful inclusion requires gender-sensitive security provisions, early involvement of women, and the recognition of informal mediation contributions.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Women are frequently excluded from the pre-negotiation stage of peace processes, which limits their ability to set the agenda and increases the requirements for their later entry into formal talks.
  • Participation in peace processes can lead to disproportionate risks for women, including physical and reputational harm resulting from the breach of restrictive gender norms.
  • Women's mediation efforts, particularly at the informal level, are often undervalued or co-opted by more powerful actors due to narrow definitions of mediation.
  • Digital technology introduces new risks for women mediators, including the 'digital divide' regarding access and literacy, as well as increased vulnerability to online intimidation and harassment.
  • Women in mediation face significant psychological burdens, including the risk of re-traumatisation from recounting conflict-induced violence and burnout from balancing mediation with domestic responsibilities.
  • The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated existing security risks for women peacebuilders, increased domestic violence, and disrupted the implementation of peace agreements through funding cuts.

Cite the original document

APA
Smith, C. S., & Tank, P. (2022). Gender and Mediation. Peace Research Institute Oslo. https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/1e8f3fa6-afdb-4173-a6db-b151e74fd67f/Gender related risk in Mediation.pdf?inline=true
Chicago
Smith, Carina Strøm, and Pinar Tank. Gender and Mediation. Peace Research Institute Oslo, 2022. https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/1e8f3fa6-afdb-4173-a6db-b151e74fd67f/Gender related risk in Mediation.pdf?inline=true.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Smith |first1=Carina Strøm |last2=Tank |first2=Pinar |title=Gender and Mediation |publisher=Peace Research Institute Oslo |date=20 April 2022 |url=https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/1e8f3fa6-afdb-4173-a6db-b151e74fd67f/Gender related risk in Mediation.pdf?inline=true |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{smith2022gender, author = {Smith, Carina Strøm and Tank, Pinar}, title = {{Gender and Mediation}}, institution = {Peace Research Institute Oslo}, year = {2022}, month = apr, url = {https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/1e8f3fa6-afdb-4173-a6db-b151e74fd67f/Gender related risk in Mediation.pdf?inline=true}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated