Integrering og migrasjonsrelatert mangfold
Summary
The text explores integration as a two-way process between immigrants and the host society, contrasting assimilation with multiculturalism. It discusses the challenges of inclusion and racialization in Norway, provides a population-geographical analysis of Norway's diverse demographic composition, and introduces the concept of 'super-diversity' to describe the complex, layered diversity found in large cities.
Key insights
- Integration is ideally understood as a two-way process where both the immigrants and the receiving society actively participate, meaning the act of incorporating new people necessarily changes the society that incorporates them.
- Historically, two ideal-typical approaches to integration have emerged: assimilation, where newcomers are expected to adapt and 'become like us' (the 'melting pot'), and multiculturalism, which accepts that differences persist while aiming for equal treatment through specific minority rights (the 'salad bowl').
- In Norway, integration processes differ by migrant status: refugees have structured programs requiring language learning and social knowledge, whereas labor migrants have largely had to manage on their own, although there is recent official recognition that language training should be a shared responsibility.
- Despite anti-discrimination laws, discrimination based on appearance remains a reality in Norway, with individuals with visible minority backgrounds—including those born and raised in Norway—experiencing more frequent mistreatment in public spaces than those with invisible backgrounds.
- Population data for 2025 indicates that approximately one-third of the Norwegian population has migration in their history, with 68% of the population consisting of people born in Norway with two Norwegian-born parents and four Norwegian-born grandparents.
- The concept of 'super-diversity' describes the layered and complex diversity in large cities, where people differ across multiple axes beyond just migration, such as religion, class, and education; this is illustrated by a 2016 study in Melbourne showing some districts had between 55 and 68 different religious identities.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Erdal, M. B. (n.d.). Integrering og migrasjonsrelatert mangfold. Peace Research Institute Oslo. https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/97835ef4-2a31-46a4-9097-b11f4bc25a75/9788202899028_kap_36.pdf?inline=true
- Chicago
- Erdal, Marta Bivand. Integrering og migrasjonsrelatert mangfold. Peace Research Institute Oslo, n.d. https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/97835ef4-2a31-46a4-9097-b11f4bc25a75/9788202899028_kap_36.pdf?inline=true.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=Erdal |first1=Marta Bivand |title=Integrering og migrasjonsrelatert mangfold |publisher=Peace Research Institute Oslo |url=https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/97835ef4-2a31-46a4-9097-b11f4bc25a75/9788202899028_kap_36.pdf?inline=true |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{erdalndintegrering, author = {Erdal, Marta Bivand}, title = {{Integrering og migrasjonsrelatert mangfold}}, institution = {Peace Research Institute Oslo}, url = {https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/97835ef4-2a31-46a4-9097-b11f4bc25a75/9788202899028_kap_36.pdf?inline=true}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated