Assessment of Indicators, Baseline Data, and Targets for MEL in Rwanda’s Mining: A GESI-enhanced perspective

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report assesses the integration of GESI into Rwanda's mining adaptation strategies, identifying a gap between high-level policy commitments and the lack of disaggregated data in implementation. While Rwanda has set targets for climate-compatible practices and site rehabilitation, current monitoring fails to track the participation of women, youth, and persons with disabilities. The report recommends mandatory disaggregated reporting, participatory community mapping via GIS, and the creation of an Inclusive Adaptation Scorecard.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Rwanda's mining workforce is characterized by a significant gender imbalance between formal and informal sectors; while women represent only 11.4% of formal mining employees, they make up 83% of the approximately 73,600 people relying on artisanal mining, many of whom lack social protection.
  • The Rwandan government has established two core adaptation indicators for the mining sector: achieving 90% of licensed operators deploying at least three climate-compatible practices by 2030 (from a 74.5% baseline in 2023/2024) and the rehabilitation of 994 abandoned mining and quarrying sites by 2030.
  • There is a critical gap in the implementation of site rehabilitation; only 23 of the 994 targeted abandoned pits have been rehabilitated, and existing remediation reports do not track whether women, youth, or persons with disabilities were involved in the planning or execution of the work.
  • Despite data gaps in adaptation projects, the Gender Budget Statement 2024/2025 shows some progress in the broader sector, with 23% of companies adopting gender-sensitive policies and women's workforce participation rising to approximately 19%.
  • The report identifies a risk that focusing solely on technical outputs, such as soil stabilization or the number of reclaimed pits, overlooks social resilience and the actual beneficiaries of adaptation efforts.

Cite the original document

APA
Tsinda, A., & Ntaganda, B. (2026). Assessment of Indicators, Baseline Data, and Targets for MEL in Rwanda’s Mining: A GESI-enhanced perspective. NAP Global Network. https://napglobalnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/rwanda-mel-mining-technical-report-v4.pdf
Chicago
Tsinda, Aime, and Brenda Ntaganda. Assessment of Indicators, Baseline Data, and Targets for MEL in Rwanda’s Mining: A GESI-enhanced perspective. NAP Global Network, 2026. https://napglobalnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/rwanda-mel-mining-technical-report-v4.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Tsinda |first1=Aime |last2=Ntaganda |first2=Brenda |title=Assessment of Indicators, Baseline Data, and Targets for MEL in Rwanda’s Mining: A GESI-enhanced perspective |publisher=NAP Global Network |date=February 2026 |url=https://napglobalnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/rwanda-mel-mining-technical-report-v4.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{tsinda2026assessment, author = {Tsinda, Aime and Ntaganda, Brenda}, title = {{Assessment of Indicators, Baseline Data, and Targets for MEL in Rwanda’s Mining: A GESI-enhanced perspective}}, institution = {NAP Global Network}, year = {2026}, month = feb, url = {https://napglobalnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/rwanda-mel-mining-technical-report-v4.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated