Towards an assessment of organised crime networks as parallel sovereignties

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document proposes a new analytical framework for understanding organised crime, suggesting that criminal networks act as 'parallel sovereigns' that exercise authority in spaces neglected by formal institutions. It argues that the global neoliberal market has replaced the state as the primary referent of sovereignty, allowing criminal networks to commoditise influence and political connectivity to integrate themselves into governance.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The traditional distinction between 'state' and 'non-state' actors is a false dichotomy that fails to account for the reality of organised crime, where criminal networks often overlap with or are indistinguishable from state power.
  • Sovereignty should be viewed as a dynamic practice and an aspiration rather than a fixed attribute of the state, meaning multiple, overlapping sovereignties can exist simultaneously across sub-national, national, and transnational contexts.
  • The global neoliberal market has emerged as the primary 'meta-sovereign', de-territorialising state power and allowing any group that can monopolise a part of the market to acquire partial sovereignty.
  • Criminal networks have expanded beyond traditional smuggling to commoditise non-traditional assets, such as political connections and influence, which they use to embed themselves in governance.
  • Criminal sovereigns often establish themselves in 'vacuums' or spaces abandoned by formal public and private institutions, creating symbiotic relationships with local communities that hinder the return of formal governance.
  • Case studies illustrate the integration of crime and state power: in Colombia, over 50% of the national legislature supported the cocaine industry by 2001; in Zimbabwe, the ZANU-PF party used Marange diamond fields to consolidate power; and in Nigeria, counterfeiters in the Oluwole neighbourhood of Lagos commoditise statehood.

Cite the original document

APA
Torkelson, E. (2014). Towards an assessment of organised crime networks as parallel sovereignties. Institute for Security Studies. https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/PolBrief59Eng.pdf
Chicago
Torkelson, Erin. Towards an assessment of organised crime networks as parallel sovereignties. Institute for Security Studies, 2014. https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/PolBrief59Eng.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Torkelson |first1=Erin |title=Towards an assessment of organised crime networks as parallel sovereignties |publisher=Institute for Security Studies |date=August 2014 |url=https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/PolBrief59Eng.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{torkelson2014towards, author = {Torkelson, Erin}, title = {{Towards an assessment of organised crime networks as parallel sovereignties}}, institution = {Institute for Security Studies}, year = {2014}, month = aug, url = {https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/PolBrief59Eng.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated