Browse all documents

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This report by the Institute for Security Studies analyzes projects aimed at preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE) in Central, East, and West Africa. It identifies critical gaps in funding duration, monitoring and evaluation (M&E) capacity, and the potential for P/CVE labeling to stigmatize target communities, while suggesting a shift toward longer-term funding and greater African state ownership.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The most common activities implemented by African P/CVE organisations are education, training, and capacity building, followed by peacebuilding and violence prevention.
  • P/CVE projects in Central, East, and West Africa are primarily funded by the European Union and individual European states, with a significant majority of these projects receiving funding for 12 months or less.
  • The most prevalent theory of change among P/CVE projects is that increasing awareness of violent extremism and its drivers will enable government agencies and communities to contribute to prevention efforts.
  • Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) for P/CVE projects often rely on informal 'observations' rather than formal plans, with East African projects showing higher rates of M&E plan implementation (61 projects) compared to West and Central Africa (22 projects).
  • Local practitioners often avoid labeling their work as 'P/CVE' to prevent negative attention from governments or extremist groups and to avoid further marginalizing specific religious or ethnic groups.
  • P/CVE initiatives can cause unintended harm by informally labeling target groups—often marginalized Muslim communities—as 'vulnerable,' which may lead to stigmatization and human rights abuses by security forces.
  • A significant gap exists in P/CVE theories of change, as they generally fail to address the ideological reasons why individuals voluntarily join violent extremist groups.

Cite the original document

APA
Institute for Security Studies (n.d.). Preventing violent extremism: lessons from Africa. https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/ar17.pdf
Chicago
Institute for Security Studies. Preventing violent extremism: lessons from Africa. n.d. https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/ar17.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Institute for Security Studies |title=Preventing violent extremism: lessons from Africa |url=https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/ar17.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{instituteforsecuritystudiesndpreventing, author = {{Institute for Security Studies}}, title = {{Preventing violent extremism: lessons from Africa}}, institution = {Institute for Security Studies}, url = {https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/ar17.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated