Kalter Wind von Rechts: Wie rechte Parteien und Akteur:innen die Klimakrise zu ihren Gunsten missbrauchen

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report analyzes how right-wing actors, particularly the AfD, instrumentalized the climate debate during the 2021 German federal election. It finds that while the AfD published the lowest percentage of climate-related content, its posts achieved significantly higher engagement than those of other parties. The study identifies a shift from outright climate denial toward a 'culture war' strategy, using disinformation narratives such as 'denial and delay' and 'absolution' to frame climate action as a threat to the German lifestyle. The analysis also highlights a stark platform divide, with Twitter predominantly hosting pro-climate messages and Facebook serving as a hub for climate-skeptical content.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The AfD significantly outperformed other parties in terms of engagement for climate-related content, with its climate posts receiving 40% to 237% more shares than its average posts on other topics.
  • Right-wing actors have shifted their strategy from denying the existence of climate change to framing climate protection as a 'culture war' and a threat to the lifestyle of voters, often labeling activists as 'climate terrorists'.
  • Two primary disinformation narratives were identified: 'Denial and Delay', which downplays the danger of climate change, and 'Absolution', which argues that Germany should not act because other countries are more responsible for global CO2 emissions.
  • There is a distinct divergence in the climate debate across social media platforms: Twitter is dominated by messages supporting climate protection, while Facebook is primarily used to share content that views climate measures negatively.
  • Right-wing actors frequently instrumentalize sensationalist headlines from established media outlets to lend credibility to disinformation and misleading claims without addressing the actual facts of the articles.

Cite the original document

APA
Matlach, P., & Janulewicz, Ł. (2021). Kalter Wind von Rechts: Wie rechte Parteien und Akteur:innen die Klimakrise zu ihren Gunsten missbrauchen. Institute for Strategic Dialogue. https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ISD_Analyse_Kalter-Wind-Klimadebatte-2021.pdf
Chicago
Matlach, Paula, and Łukasz Janulewicz. Kalter Wind von Rechts: Wie rechte Parteien und Akteur:innen die Klimakrise zu ihren Gunsten missbrauchen. Institute for Strategic Dialogue, 2021. https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ISD_Analyse_Kalter-Wind-Klimadebatte-2021.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Matlach |first1=Paula |last2=Janulewicz |first2=Łukasz |title=Kalter Wind von Rechts: Wie rechte Parteien und Akteur:innen die Klimakrise zu ihren Gunsten missbrauchen |publisher=Institute for Strategic Dialogue |date=2021 |url=https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ISD_Analyse_Kalter-Wind-Klimadebatte-2021.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{matlach2021kalter, author = {Matlach, Paula and Janulewicz, Łukasz}, title = {{Kalter Wind von Rechts: Wie rechte Parteien und Akteur:innen die Klimakrise zu ihren Gunsten missbrauchen}}, institution = {Institute for Strategic Dialogue}, year = {2021}, url = {https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ISD_Analyse_Kalter-Wind-Klimadebatte-2021.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated