Guidance for Governments: Improving legal frameworks for environmental and social impact assessment and management

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The guide outlines 20 essential components of a comprehensive legal framework for ESIA in the mining sector, covering the entire mine life cycle from exploration to post-closure. It emphasizes the importance of integrating social impacts alongside environmental ones, ensuring meaningful stakeholder engagement, and establishing robust financial assurances for mine closure. The document provides a phased roadmap for government action, practical tools for gap analysis and legal reform, and case studies on investor-state disputes to illustrate the risks of inadequate ESIA processes.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • A comprehensive legal framework for ESIA and management should consist of 20 core components, including a stated commitment to sustainable development, consistency across legal instruments, coverage of all mine life phases, and clear conditions for relinquishment.
  • Governments are advised to avoid 'legal stabilization' clauses in contracts and laws that freeze outdated environmental and social provisions, as this hinders the ability to update protections and can create multiple conflicting legal regimes.
  • Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment (SESA) is recommended as a high-level tool to define a government's overall vision and land-use plans for the mining sector, including the identification of 'excluded zones' where mining is prohibited.
  • The screening process is critical for determining if a full ESIA is required; large-scale mining projects and major expansions should always require a full ESIA process.
  • Meaningful public engagement must be integrated early in the ESIA process and sustained throughout the mine life, moving beyond simple information dissemination to a multi-directional dialogue.
  • Financial assurance for remediation and mine closure must be required prior to the approval of construction and operation permits and should be based on sound engineering rather than political negotiation.
  • Mine closure planning must address both environmental and socioeconomic aspects, including the risk of 'ghost towns' and the need for economic diversification in mine-dependent communities.
  • Inadequate or non-transparent ESIA processes can lead to costly Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) cases, particularly when governments deny permits based on criteria not clearly defined in the legal framework or Terms of Reference.
  • Governments should implement a 'gap analysis' to compare their current legal frameworks against international good practice as a first step toward reform.
  • The guide highlights the necessity of integrating gender-based impacts into ESIAs, noting that mining often disproportionately affects women through inequitable compensation and increased workloads.

Cite the original document

APA
Bruckner, K. D., Naré, C., Hill, J., Nikièma, H. S., Baker, J., & Torres, C. L. (2020). Guidance for Governments: Improving legal frameworks for environmental and social impact assessment and management. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/igf-guidance-for-governments-esia-en.pdf
Chicago
Bruckner, Kristi Disney, Clémence Naré, Jenifer Hill, H. Suzy Nikièma, Jill Baker, and Carolina Leseigneur Torres. Guidance for Governments: Improving legal frameworks for environmental and social impact assessment and management. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2020. https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/igf-guidance-for-governments-esia-en.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Bruckner |first1=Kristi Disney |last2=Naré |first2=Clémence |last3=Hill |first3=Jenifer |last4=Nikièma |first4=H. Suzy |last5=Baker |first5=Jill |last6=Torres |first6=Carolina Leseigneur |title=Guidance for Governments: Improving legal frameworks for environmental and social impact assessment and management |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=June 2020 |url=https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/igf-guidance-for-governments-esia-en.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{bruckner2020guidance, author = {Bruckner, Kristi Disney and Naré, Clémence and Hill, Jenifer and Nikièma, H. Suzy and Baker, Jill and Torres, Carolina Leseigneur}, title = {{Guidance for Governments: Improving legal frameworks for environmental and social impact assessment and management}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2020}, month = jun, url = {https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/igf-guidance-for-governments-esia-en.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated