Que signifie l'avis consultatif de la Cour internationale de Justice sur le changement climatique pour les subventions néfastes pour l'environnement ?
Summary
This briefing by the International Institute for Sustainable Development analyzes the implications of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) advisory opinion on climate change, asserting that states now have a legal obligation to phase out environmentally harmful subsidies, particularly those for fossil fuels.
Key insights
- The International Court of Justice (ICJ) advisory opinion has established that phasing out fossil fuel subsidies is a mandatory legal obligation for states, rather than merely a political commitment. While the court considers available resources and state capacities, states are required to take all possible actions to protect the climate.
- Although the ICJ decision explicitly mentioned fossil fuel subsidies, the reasoning may extend to other climate-harming subsidies, such as those in the agricultural sector. To mitigate legal risk, states should act to phase out all forms of national financial support that threaten the environment.
- Governments currently spend over 2,000 billion USD annually on subsidies with negative effects on nature and climate, and have failed to honor previous commitments to phase them out.
- The document recommends four primary actions for states to reduce legal risk: documenting all harmful financial supports for transparency, phasing out subsidies gradually to minimize socio-economic disruption (e.g., during periods of low oil prices), redirecting savings toward green solutions and population support, and coordinating internationally through frameworks like COFFIS.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Jones,, N. (2026). Que signifie l'avis consultatif de la Cour internationale de Justice sur le changement climatique pour les subventions néfastes pour l'environnement ? International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/fr/publications/brief/icj-advisory-opinion-environmentally-harmful-subsidies
- Chicago
- Jones,, Natalie. Que signifie l'avis consultatif de la Cour internationale de Justice sur le changement climatique pour les subventions néfastes pour l'environnement ? International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2026. https://www.iisd.org/fr/publications/brief/icj-advisory-opinion-environmentally-harmful-subsidies.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=Jones, |first1=Natalie |title=Que signifie l'avis consultatif de la Cour internationale de Justice sur le changement climatique pour les subventions néfastes pour l'environnement ? |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=17 March 2026 |url=https://www.iisd.org/fr/publications/brief/icj-advisory-opinion-environmentally-harmful-subsidies |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{jones2026que, author = {Jones,, Natalie}, title = {{Que signifie l'avis consultatif de la Cour internationale de Justice sur le changement climatique pour les subventions néfastes pour l'environnement ?}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2026}, month = mar, url = {https://www.iisd.org/fr/publications/brief/icj-advisory-opinion-environmentally-harmful-subsidies}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated