The G20 at a crossroads

The G20 is assessed as an effective tool for short-term macroeconomic crisis response but a failure in delivering structural economic justice. While it mobilised trillions during the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, it has consistently prioritised creditor interests and market stability over the needs of the Global South. The report highlights systemic failures in international financial architecture reform, sovereign debt restructuring, and climate finance, where funding remains insufficient and skewed toward profitable mitigation. However, recent Global South presidencies (Indonesia, India, Brazil, and South Africa) have successfully introduced new priorities, such as taxing the super-rich and the care economy. The authors recommend that the G20 redefine 'crisis' to include social and ecological threats and adopt justice-based metrics for success.

• The G20 has proven effective at rapid macroeconomic coordination during systemic crises, such as the 2009 London summit where $1.1tn was pledged for credit and growth, but it fails to address systemic inequities regarding debt, ecology, and social insecurity.
• G20 members contribute to the environmental crises they claim to address, providing $1.4tn in explicit fossil-fuel support in 2022, with total subsidies reaching $7tn (7.1% of global GDP) when under-pricing of damages is included.
• Reform of the international financial architecture (IFA) has been incremental and technocratic, preserving the dominance of Global North powers; for example, Africa received only 5% of the $650bn in Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) allocated in 2021.
• G20 debt initiatives like the Debt Service Suspension Initiative (DSSI) and the Common Framework have been limited by voluntary participation and creditor-first logics, often resulting in prolonged austerity for debtor nations such as Zambia, where nearly 45% of revenues were absorbed by debt service during negotiations.
• Global tax reforms under the G20's Inclusive Framework have been hampered by US opposition and low minimum rates; Pillar One collapsed due to US resistance, and Pillar Two's 15% minimum corporate tax rate is viewed as risking a global "race to the bottom" as it is lower than statutory rates in Africa and Latin America.
• Climate finance is insufficient and skewed toward commercially attractive mitigation, with $1.78tn for mitigation versus only $65bn for adaptation in 2023, while the G20 has failed to deliver on the UNFCCC's $100bn annual target.
• Recent Global South presidencies have shifted the G20 agenda: Indonesia focused on Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs), India on digital public infrastructure, Brazil on taxing the super-rich, and South Africa on the care economy and adaptation finance.
• Labour's influence in the G20 has been inconsistent, with a decline in the labour share of income (down 1.6 percentage points between 2004 and 2024) and a failure to move beyond symbolic language to structural redistribution.
• The COVID-19 pandemic served as a stress test that revealed the G20's ability to stabilise markets but not to redistribute resources, evidenced by 'vaccine apartheid' where 75.8% of doses went to just ten countries by mid-2021.

APA

Anderson, S., Balata, F., Campos, I. M., de Conti, B., James, R., Leite, M., Makoga, S. W., Mamberti, M. E., Mzezewa, T., Rocha, M. A., & Saliba, C. (2025). The G20 at a crossroads. Institute for Economic Justice. https://iej.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/The-G20-at-a-crossroads-D.pdf

Chicago

Anderson, Sarah, Fernanda Balata, Iago Montalvão Campos, Bruno de Conti, Reyanna James, Marianna Leite, Shikwane Warren Makoga, et al. The G20 at a crossroads. Institute for Economic Justice, 2025. https://iej.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/The-G20-at-a-crossroads-D.pdf.

Wikipedia

{{cite report |last1=Anderson |first1=Sarah |last2=Balata |first2=Fernanda |last3=Campos |first3=Iago Montalvão |last4=de Conti |first4=Bruno |last5=James |first5=Reyanna |last6=Leite |first6=Marianna |last7=Makoga |first7=Shikwane Warren |last8=Mamberti |first8=María Emilia |last9=Mzezewa |first9=Tatenda |display-authors=etal |title=The G20 at a crossroads |publisher=Institute for Economic Justice |date=November 2025 |url=https://iej.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/The-G20-at-a-crossroads-D.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}

BibTeX

@techreport{anderson2025g20, author = {Anderson, Sarah and Balata, Fernanda and Campos, Iago Montalvão and de Conti, Bruno and James, Reyanna and Leite, Marianna and Makoga, Shikwane Warren and Mamberti, María Emilia and Mzezewa, Tatenda and Rocha, Marco Antonio and Saliba, Clara}, title = {{The G20 at a crossroads}}, institution = {Institute for Economic Justice}, year = {2025}, month = nov, url = {https://iej.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/The-G20-at-a-crossroads-D.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }