Accreditation assessment of applicant 102 (APL102)
Summary
The Green Climate Fund's Accreditation Panel assessed Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan (Kemitraan), an Indonesian non-profit, for fast-track accreditation. The assessment found that Kemitraan meets all required basic and specialized fiduciary standards, environmental and social safeguards for minimal risk (Category C/I-3), and gender policy requirements. Kemitraan has a track record of managing over USD 130 million in donor contributions and implementing climate-related projects, including peatland restoration and REDD+ infrastructure. The Panel recommends accreditation for micro-sized projects with no conditions.
Key insights
- Kemitraan is recommended for accreditation as a national direct access entity in Indonesia for micro-sized projects, defined as those with maximum total projected costs up to and including USD 10 million.
- The applicant's fiduciary capacities meet GCF standards, including basic fiduciary standards, project management, and grant award mechanisms. Kemitraan has managed over USD 130 million in donor contributions from more than 30 multilateral institutions over 15 years.
- Kemitraan's environmental and social (E&S) management system is deemed sufficient for the 'minimal to no risk' category (Category C/I-3). The assessment noted that the entity's E&S maturity exceeds the requirements for this category, suggesting it could potentially seek an upgrade to medium risk (Category B/I-2) in the future.
- The entity's gender policy, procedures, and competencies are consistent with the Updated GCF Gender Policy, supported by a track record of projects that improved women's representation in political institutions and strengthened local women's capacity in village planning.
- Kemitraan has a demonstrated track record in climate-related financing in Indonesia, including USD 7.7 million for peatland restoration in 109 villages across 7 provinces and USD 6.8 million for REDD+ infrastructure.
- The applicant maintains robust transparency and accountability mechanisms, including a code of conduct with zero tolerance for fraud, a whistle-blower protection policy, and an investigation function overseen by the Head of the Internal Audit Unit reporting to the Executive Board.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Green Climate Fund (n.d.). Accreditation assessment of applicant 102 (APL102). https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/decision/b27/decision-b27-05-pages-decision-b27-05-annex-ii.pdf
- Chicago
- Green Climate Fund. Accreditation assessment of applicant 102 (APL102). n.d. https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/decision/b27/decision-b27-05-pages-decision-b27-05-annex-ii.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |author=Green Climate Fund |title=Accreditation assessment of applicant 102 (APL102) |url=https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/decision/b27/decision-b27-05-pages-decision-b27-05-annex-ii.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{greenclimatefundndaccreditation, author = {{Green Climate Fund}}, title = {{Accreditation assessment of applicant 102 (APL102)}}, institution = {Green Climate Fund}, url = {https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/decision/b27/decision-b27-05-pages-decision-b27-05-annex-ii.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated