Browse all documents

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This report by Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe and Sandbag analyzes the draft National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs) of 21 EU Member States that use coal for electricity. It finds that the EU is on track to miss the goal of stopping coal use by 2030 to limit global warming to 1.5°C, with 60 GW of capacity projected to remain in 2030.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The EU is projected to have 60 GW of installed coal capacity in 2030, representing a 58% decrease from the 2019 level of 143 GW. This indicates the EU will miss the goal of stopping coal use for electricity by 2030 required to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C.
  • Of the 21 EU Member States using coal for electricity, 8 have clear commitments to phase out coal between 2021 and 2030, 2 will phase out coal without an explicit objective in their draft NECPs, and 11 do not plan to phase out coal by 2030.
  • The majority of the EU's remaining coal power capacity in 2030 is expected to be concentrated in six Member States: Poland, Germany, Czechia, Bulgaria, Romania, and Greece.
  • Several Member States are receiving EU energy transition support through the Coal Regions in Transition Platform despite showing little or no intent to decrease coal capacity by 2030 in their NECPs. These include Czechia, Greece, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia.
  • Air pollution from coal power stations in Bulgaria, Czechia, Poland, Romania, Greece, Slovakia, and Slovenia is estimated to cause 5,460 premature deaths and nearly 105,000 childhood asthma attacks annually, with a societal cost of up to approximately 16 billion euros.

Cite the original document

APA
Flisowska, J., & Moore, C. (2019). Just transition or just talk? Ember. https://ember-energy.org/app/uploads/2020/03/Just-Transition-or-Just-Talk-2019.pdf
Chicago
Flisowska, Joanna, and Charles Moore. Just transition or just talk? Ember, 2019. https://ember-energy.org/app/uploads/2020/03/Just-Transition-or-Just-Talk-2019.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Flisowska |first1=Joanna |last2=Moore |first2=Charles |title=Just transition or just talk? |publisher=Ember |date=May 2019 |url=https://ember-energy.org/app/uploads/2020/03/Just-Transition-or-Just-Talk-2019.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{flisowska2019just, author = {Flisowska, Joanna and Moore, Charles}, title = {{Just transition or just talk?}}, institution = {Ember}, year = {2019}, month = may, url = {https://ember-energy.org/app/uploads/2020/03/Just-Transition-or-Just-Talk-2019.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated