june-2013-nudging-toward-a-healthy-natural-environment-how-behavioral-change-research-can-inform-conservation-11baa7ff683cafc7.pdf

The report argues that traditional conservation policies relying on regulation and financial incentives are often insufficient because they ignore the psychological and social drivers of human behavior. It proposes a 'soft policy' approach using 'nudges'—small changes in the decision-making context—to encourage voluntary pro-environmental actions. The authors identify five primary 'areas of influence' for behavior change: attitudes, personal agency, emotions, social norms, and the environmental/decision context. To improve conservation outcomes, the report recommends that practitioners explicitly use social science evidence, track social indicators alongside ecological ones, and employ experimental or quasi-experimental designs to identify causal relationships between interventions and behavioral changes.

• Traditional conservation tools like regulations and financial incentives often fail because they assume humans are primarily motivated by self-interest and material rewards, ignoring pro-social motivations such as fairness, trust, and identity.
• The report identifies five 'areas of influence' that can be leveraged to promote pro-environmental behavior: attitudes, personal agency, emotions, social norms, and the environmental or decision context.
• Positive attitudes are necessary but often insufficient for behavior change; a 'gap' frequently exists between pro-environmental knowledge/attitudes and actual action due to barriers like social norms or lack of personal agency.
• Personal agency, or self-efficacy, is a critical driver of action, particularly when individuals perceive impediments to a behavior; it can be strengthened through feedback and by observing similar peers model the behavior.
• Emotional responses, specifically 'affect,' often override cognitive evaluations in decision-making. While 'cute' animals can inspire conservation value, 'fear appeals' regarding threats like climate change can backfire if individuals do not believe they have the means to protect themselves.
• Social norms can be powerful motivators, but communicating descriptive norms (what others are doing) without injunctive norms (what is considered appropriate) can lead to a 'boomerang effect' where low-impact users increase their consumption to match the average.
• Choice architecture, such as setting 'green' options as the default, can significantly influence behavior because people exhibit a bias toward the status quo.
• The report recommends a programmatic approach to behavioral change involving four stages: research for optimal design, pilot testing, implementation, and evaluation to create a feedback loop for adaptive management.
• To advance the field, the authors suggest developing searchable databases of behavioral interventions and using 'consensus conferences' to standardize terminology and identify research priorities across academic and practitioner communities.

APA

Akerlof, K., & Kennedy, C. (2013). june-2013-nudging-toward-a-healthy-natural-environment-how-behavioral-change-research-can-inform-conservation-11baa7ff683cafc7.pdf. Center for Climate Change Communication. https://climatecommunication.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/June-2013-Nudging-Toward-a-Healthy-Natural-Environment-How-Behavioral-Change-Research-Can-Inform-Conservation.pdf

Chicago

Akerlof, Karen, and Chris Kennedy. june-2013-nudging-toward-a-healthy-natural-environment-how-behavioral-change-research-can-inform-conservation-11baa7ff683cafc7.pdf. Center for Climate Change Communication, 2013. https://climatecommunication.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/June-2013-Nudging-Toward-a-Healthy-Natural-Environment-How-Behavioral-Change-Research-Can-Inform-Conservation.pdf.

Wikipedia

{{cite report |last1=Akerlof |first1=Karen |last2=Kennedy |first2=Chris |title=june-2013-nudging-toward-a-healthy-natural-environment-how-behavioral-change-research-can-inform-conservation-11baa7ff683cafc7.pdf |publisher=Center for Climate Change Communication |date=10 June 2013 |url=https://climatecommunication.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/June-2013-Nudging-Toward-a-Healthy-Natural-Environment-How-Behavioral-Change-Research-Can-Inform-Conservation.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}

BibTeX

@techreport{akerlof2013june2013nudgingtowardahealthynaturalenvironmenthowbehavioralchangeresearchcaninformconservation11baa7ff683cafc7pdf, author = {Akerlof, Karen and Kennedy, Chris}, title = {{june-2013-nudging-toward-a-healthy-natural-environment-how-behavioral-change-research-can-inform-conservation-11baa7ff683cafc7.pdf}}, institution = {Center for Climate Change Communication}, year = {2013}, month = jun, url = {https://climatecommunication.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/June-2013-Nudging-Toward-a-Healthy-Natural-Environment-How-Behavioral-Change-Research-Can-Inform-Conservation.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }