Over-crediting analysis PoA 10415 Results from python analysis

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The analysis finds that PoA 10415 is likely to issue 26.33 times more credits than it should have across monitoring periods 5, 6, and 7. This over-crediting is driven by multiple factors, with the fraction of non-renewable biomass (fNRB) contributing a factor of 2.94 and fuel stacking contributing 2.19. The project, based in Myanmar, is transitioning from the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) to the Article 6.4 mechanism of the Paris Agreement.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Based on the application of Gill-Wiehl's (2024) methodology, PoA 10415 is likely to issue 26.33 times more credits than it should have across monitoring periods 5, 6, and 7.
  • The over-crediting is the result of several contributing factors across the monitoring periods, with the highest individual impact coming from the fNRB value at 2.94 and fuel stacking at 2.19.
  • The project PoA 10415 has been approved by the Article 6.4 Supervisory Body to transition from the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) to the Article 6.4 mechanism, also known as the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (PACM).

Cite the original document

APA
Carbon Market Watch (n.d.). Over-crediting analysis PoA 10415 Results from python analysis. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Results-Over-crediting-analysis-10415.pdf
Chicago
Carbon Market Watch. Over-crediting analysis PoA 10415 Results from python analysis. n.d. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Results-Over-crediting-analysis-10415.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Carbon Market Watch |title=Over-crediting analysis PoA 10415 Results from python analysis |url=https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Results-Over-crediting-analysis-10415.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{carbonmarketwatchndovercrediting, author = {{Carbon Market Watch}}, title = {{Over-crediting analysis PoA 10415 Results from python analysis}}, institution = {Carbon Market Watch}, url = {https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Results-Over-crediting-analysis-10415.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated