Promoting climate-smart-agriculture with carbon markets would not be a smart move

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document opposes using carbon markets to promote climate-smart agriculture, citing the risk of impermanence in soil and forest carbon sequestration compared to permanent fossil fuel emissions. It highlights that land use accounts for 24% of global emissions and suggests that finance for these activities should be mobilized through non-market mechanisms like Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) to avoid compromising food security and adaptation.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Carbon sequestration in forests and soils is temporary and cannot compensate for permanent fossil fuel emissions because it can be easily reversed, such as through deforestation.
  • Forests and land use are significant emission sources, accounting for 24% of global emissions (10-12 GtCo2e annually), and represented over 61% of greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil in 2012.
  • Integrating land use activities into the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) faces several challenges, including the need for reliable accounting frameworks, the risk of subsidizing unsustainable industrial tree plantations, and an existing oversupply of carbon offsets.
  • Carbon markets are deemed inappropriate for land use activities because they prioritize mitigation over adaptation, food security, and social or environmental safeguards.
  • Funding for reducing emissions from deforestation and land use should be sourced outside of carbon markets, with Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) identified as a viable alternative for developing countries.

Cite the original document

APA
CMW (2014). Promoting climate-smart-agriculture with carbon markets would not be a smart move. Carbon Market Watch. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/2014/11/25/promoting-climate-smart-agriculture-with-carbon-markets-would-not-be-a-smart-move/
Chicago
CMW. Promoting climate-smart-agriculture with carbon markets would not be a smart move. Carbon Market Watch, 2014. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/2014/11/25/promoting-climate-smart-agriculture-with-carbon-markets-would-not-be-a-smart-move/.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |last1=CMW |title=Promoting climate-smart-agriculture with carbon markets would not be a smart move |publisher=Carbon Market Watch |date=25 November 2014 |url=https://carbonmarketwatch.org/2014/11/25/promoting-climate-smart-agriculture-with-carbon-markets-would-not-be-a-smart-move/ |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{cmw2014promoting, author = {CMW}, title = {{Promoting climate-smart-agriculture with carbon markets would not be a smart move}}, publisher = {Carbon Market Watch}, year = {2014}, month = nov, url = {https://carbonmarketwatch.org/2014/11/25/promoting-climate-smart-agriculture-with-carbon-markets-would-not-be-a-smart-move/}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated