Peluang untuk Meningkatkan Produktivitas dan Profitabilitas Petani Kecil Kelapa Sawit di Kalimantan Tengah

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The fact sheet analyzes three organizational models for smallholder oil palm farmers in Central Kalimantan: individual partnerships, cooperatives, and company-managed plasma schemes. It finds that larger, integrated models—specifically cooperatives and company-managed schemes—yield higher harvests and profits per hectare compared to individual partnerships. Cooperatives are highlighted as the most effective for risk management and farmer control, though they face institutional and financial barriers to establishment. Individual partnerships show the lowest performance, achieving only 52% of potential yields and facing high legal, supply, production, and market risks.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Integrated organizational models, specifically cooperatives and company-managed plasma schemes, provide superior results in terms of harvest volume and profit per hectare compared to individual partnerships, as they enable more efficient planning and risk mutualization.
  • The cooperative plasma model is the most successful in managing production and market risks, achieving 95% of potential harvest levels and offering farmers greater control over their land, although its establishment is hindered by institutional weaknesses, lack of financial transparency, and poor budget accountability.
  • Company-managed plasma models achieve high profitability per hectare through high harvest levels and efficient operational cost management, but they provide less empowerment and fewer benefits to smallholders and communities than cooperatives.
  • Individual partnership models represent the greatest area for improvement, as they produce the lowest profit levels and only reach 52% of potential harvest yields, while leaving independent smallholders exposed to significant legal, supply, production, and market risks.

Cite the original document

APA
Climate Policy Initiative (n.d.). Peluang untuk Meningkatkan Produktivitas dan Profitabilitas Petani Kecil Kelapa Sawit di Kalimantan Tengah. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Peluang-untuk-Meningkatkan-Produktivitas-dan-Profitabilitas-Petani-Kecil-Kelapa-Sawit-di-Kalimantan-Tengah-Fact-Sheet-Bahasa.pdf
Chicago
Climate Policy Initiative. Peluang untuk Meningkatkan Produktivitas dan Profitabilitas Petani Kecil Kelapa Sawit di Kalimantan Tengah. n.d. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Peluang-untuk-Meningkatkan-Produktivitas-dan-Profitabilitas-Petani-Kecil-Kelapa-Sawit-di-Kalimantan-Tengah-Fact-Sheet-Bahasa.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Climate Policy Initiative |title=Peluang untuk Meningkatkan Produktivitas dan Profitabilitas Petani Kecil Kelapa Sawit di Kalimantan Tengah |url=https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Peluang-untuk-Meningkatkan-Produktivitas-dan-Profitabilitas-Petani-Kecil-Kelapa-Sawit-di-Kalimantan-Tengah-Fact-Sheet-Bahasa.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{climatepolicyinitiativendpeluang, author = {{Climate Policy Initiative}}, title = {{Peluang untuk Meningkatkan Produktivitas dan Profitabilitas Petani Kecil Kelapa Sawit di Kalimantan Tengah}}, institution = {Climate Policy Initiative}, url = {https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Peluang-untuk-Meningkatkan-Produktivitas-dan-Profitabilitas-Petani-Kecil-Kelapa-Sawit-di-Kalimantan-Tengah-Fact-Sheet-Bahasa.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated