Jabuti em medida provisória enfraquece a proteção da Floresta Amazônica no Código Florestal

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document analyzes how 'jabuti' amendments to MP 901/2019 seek to lower the native vegetation coverage requirement from 80% to 50% in Roraima and Amapá by easing the conditions for Legal Reserve reductions and including non-environmental areas in the 65% territory threshold. It also warns that a proposal to reduce over 4,000 hectares of the Roraima National Forest is unconstitutional based on STF precedent.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The proposed amendment to the Forest Code (specifically the addition of §5º-A to art. 12) would allow the state governments of Roraima and Amapá to reduce native vegetation coverage on rural properties to 50%. This change removes the requirement to consult the State Environmental Council and changes the conditions for reduction from cumulative to alternative: states would only need either an approved Ecological-Economic Zoning (ZEE) or more than 65% of their territory occupied by specific protected areas.
  • The amendment expands the types of land that count toward the 65% territory threshold required for Legal Reserve reductions. In addition to public nature conservation units and ratified indigenous lands, it would now include military lands, federal highway perimeters, and other areas instituted by the Union. This change could enable Roraima to meet the requirements for the exception, as it is one of only two states in the Legal Amazon without an approved ZEE.
  • Another amendment in the conversion bill proposes reducing more than 4,000 hectares of the Roraima National Forest. The document asserts this is unconstitutional because the Supreme Federal Court (STF) has already ruled in ADI 4717 that reducing preserved areas via provisional measure is not permitted.

Cite the original document

APA
Chiavari, J., de Araújo, J. N., & Lopes, C. L. (2020). Jabuti em medida provisória enfraquece a proteção da Floresta Amazônica no Código Florestal. Climate Policy Initiative. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/NT-Jabuti-medida-provisoria-enfraquece-protecao-Floresta-Amazonica-Codigo-Florestal.pdf
Chicago
Chiavari, Joana, Julia Nardi de Araújo, and Cristina Leme Lopes. Jabuti em medida provisória enfraquece a proteção da Floresta Amazônica no Código Florestal. Climate Policy Initiative, 2020. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/NT-Jabuti-medida-provisoria-enfraquece-protecao-Floresta-Amazonica-Codigo-Florestal.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Chiavari |first1=Joana |last2=de Araújo |first2=Julia Nardi |last3=Lopes |first3=Cristina Leme |title=Jabuti em medida provisória enfraquece a proteção da Floresta Amazônica no Código Florestal |publisher=Climate Policy Initiative |date=February 2020 |url=https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/NT-Jabuti-medida-provisoria-enfraquece-protecao-Floresta-Amazonica-Codigo-Florestal.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{chiavari2020jabuti, author = {Chiavari, Joana and de Araújo, Julia Nardi and Lopes, Cristina Leme}, title = {{Jabuti em medida provisória enfraquece a proteção da Floresta Amazônica no Código Florestal}}, institution = {Climate Policy Initiative}, year = {2020}, month = feb, url = {https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/NT-Jabuti-medida-provisoria-enfraquece-protecao-Floresta-Amazonica-Codigo-Florestal.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated