MRV系统设计：对中国绿色债券市场的建议

The report finds significant disparities in disclosure quality across different types of Chinese green bonds, with green financial bonds performing best and green enterprise bonds worst. It notes that offshore green bonds generally exhibit higher transparency than onshore ones. The analysis reveals that while 73% of onshore green bonds had pre-issuance third-party certification, only 59% had follow-up tracking certification. To enhance market credibility, the report recommends mandatory environmental benefit disclosure, the creation of standardized reporting templates, the establishment of a centralized information platform by the China Central Depository & Clearing Co. Ltd. (CCDC), and the unification of green bond standards across different regulatory bodies.

APA

Escalante, D., Choi, J., & Chin, N. (2020). MRV系统设计：对中国绿色债券市场的建议. Climate Policy Initiative. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/MRV系统设计：对中国.pdf

Chicago

Escalante, Donovan, June Choi, and Neil Chin. MRV系统设计：对中国绿色债券市场的建议. Climate Policy Initiative, 2020. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/MRV系统设计：对中国.pdf.

Wikipedia

{{cite report |last1=Escalante |first1=Donovan |last2=Choi |first2=June |last3=Chin |first3=Neil |title=MRV系统设计：对中国绿色债券市场的建议 |publisher=Climate Policy Initiative |date=June 2020 |url=https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/MRV系统设计：对中国.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}

BibTeX

@techreport{escalante2020mrv, author = {Escalante, Donovan and Choi, June and Chin, Neil}, title = {{MRV系统设计：对中国绿色债券市场的建议}}, institution = {Climate Policy Initiative}, year = {2020}, month = jun, url = {https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/MRV系统设计：对中国.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }