Browse all documents

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This report by the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI/PUC-Rio) analyzes rural credit in the Brazilian Amazon, identifying six specific patterns that distinguish it from the rest of Brazil. The analysis highlights limited credit access, a heavy reliance on public banks, and a predominance of livestock financing, which the authors link to extensive land use and deforestation.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Rural credit in the Amazon is heavily skewed toward livestock, which is closely linked to deforestation. In the 2019/20 agricultural year, 57% of the value of credit operations in Amazon biome municipalities went to livestock, compared to 32% in the rest of Brazil.
  • Producers in the Amazon face greater restrictions in accessing rural credit than those in other Brazilian regions. While 13% of Brazilian rural producers are located in the Amazon, the region accounted for only 7.2% of the total value of rural credit operations in Brazil during the 2016/17 agricultural year.
  • Agricultural activity in the Amazon is less entrepreneurial than in the rest of the country. In the 2019/20 agricultural year, legal entities (companies) received only 4.8% of the total credit in the region, whereas they received 26% in the rest of Brazil.
  • The rural credit market in the Amazon is characterized by low competition and a dominance of public banks. In 78% of the region's municipalities, the primary source of credit is either Banco do Brasil or Banco da Amazônia.
  • There has been a shift in funding sources for rural credit in the Amazon. The Fundo Constitucional do Norte (FNO), which provided nearly half of the region's credit in 2000/01 (49%), fell to 17% by 2019/20, while private investments like Letras de Crédito Agrícola (LCA) grew to 12% of the resources by 2019/20.
  • The Pronaf program (for family farming) is more relevant in the Amazon than the Pronamp program (for medium producers). In 2019/20, Pronaf operations represented 17% of the credit volume in the Amazon, while Pronamp represented 10%. This is partly because larger fiscal modules in the North allow producers with relatively larger properties to qualify for Pronaf.

Cite the original document

APA
Souza, P., Campos, G., Herschmann, S., Vogt, P., & Assunção, J. (2021). 6 Peculiaridades do Crédito Rural na Amazônia. Climate Policy Initiative. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Destaque-6-Peculiaridades-do-Credito-Rural-na-Amazonia.pdf
Chicago
Souza, Priscila, Gabriel Campos, Stela Herschmann, Pedro Vogt, and Juliano Assunção. 6 Peculiaridades do Crédito Rural na Amazônia. Climate Policy Initiative, 2021. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Destaque-6-Peculiaridades-do-Credito-Rural-na-Amazonia.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Souza |first1=Priscila |last2=Campos |first2=Gabriel |last3=Herschmann |first3=Stela |last4=Vogt |first4=Pedro |last5=Assunção |first5=Juliano |title=6 Peculiaridades do Crédito Rural na Amazônia |publisher=Climate Policy Initiative |date=May 2021 |url=https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Destaque-6-Peculiaridades-do-Credito-Rural-na-Amazonia.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{souza2021peculiaridades, author = {Souza, Priscila and Campos, Gabriel and Herschmann, Stela and Vogt, Pedro and Assunção, Juliano}, title = {{6 Peculiaridades do Crédito Rural na Amazônia}}, institution = {Climate Policy Initiative}, year = {2021}, month = may, url = {https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Destaque-6-Peculiaridades-do-Credito-Rural-na-Amazonia.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated