SUBSIDIES FOR CDM: PAST EXPERIENCES WITH CAPACITY BUILDING

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The research paper evaluates the impact of approximately 43 million Euros spent on CDM capacity building in Africa and LDCs over a decade. It finds that while institutional support for establishing Designated National Authorities (DNAs) was generally successful, subsidies for project development were largely ineffective, resulting in a high implicit cost per registered project. The authors argue that a holistic approach coordinating the entire CDM process is necessary for better outcomes.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Approximately 43 million Euros were spent on CDM capacity building in Africa and LDCs over the last 10 years, representing about 10% of the total CDM revenues in these countries.
  • Capacity building focused on the establishment of Designated National Authorities (DNAs) was generally successful, though many DNAs lack the long-term commitment to maintain updated websites or attract project developers.
  • Subsidies for project development were largely ineffective; 70% of countries receiving such support have no registered projects, and the implicit subsidy reaches almost 1 million Euros per registered project.
  • Countries that received a comprehensive combination of awareness raising, institutional capacity building, and project development support were more successful in registering CDM projects than those receiving only one or two types of support.
  • The share of Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) from registered African and LDC projects is only 3% of the global total, indicating that the first objective of the CDM to reduce greenhouse gas emissions has not been effectively achieved through these subsidies.

Cite the original document

APA
Okubo, Y., & Michaelowa, A. (2009). SUBSIDIES FOR CDM: PAST EXPERIENCES WITH CAPACITY BUILDING. Climate Strategies. https://climatestrategies.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/subsidies-for-cdm.pdf
Chicago
Okubo, Yuri, and Axel Michaelowa. SUBSIDIES FOR CDM: PAST EXPERIENCES WITH CAPACITY BUILDING. Climate Strategies, 2009. https://climatestrategies.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/subsidies-for-cdm.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Okubo |first1=Yuri |last2=Michaelowa |first2=Axel |title=SUBSIDIES FOR CDM: PAST EXPERIENCES WITH CAPACITY BUILDING |publisher=Climate Strategies |date=30 March 2009 |url=https://climatestrategies.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/subsidies-for-cdm.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{okubo2009subsidies, author = {Okubo, Yuri and Michaelowa, Axel}, title = {{SUBSIDIES FOR CDM: PAST EXPERIENCES WITH CAPACITY BUILDING}}, institution = {Climate Strategies}, year = {2009}, month = mar, url = {https://climatestrategies.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/subsidies-for-cdm.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated