NATIONAL FUNDING ENTITIES
Summary
The document advocates for a shift in global climate finance from centrally managed models to a paradigm where national funding entities in developing countries identify needs and manage resources. It argues that local institutions are best equipped to handle the complex financial requirements of mitigation and adaptation and to mainstream these activities into national development strategies. The brief surveys various existing and emerging funds in countries such as Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Bangladesh, highlighting their diverse governance structures and funding sources. It concludes that while many countries are innovating, there is a significant need for capacity development to manage the intricacies of climate finance, and that international institutions should transition to a supportive role focused on technical assistance and risk mitigation.
Key insights
- The author argues that the impact of climate funding will increase if responsibility is devolved to the national level, creating a more effective era of global cooperation to avoid "dangerous" climate change.
- National funding entities are better positioned than global institutions to address the varied and complex financing requirements of different climate activities, such as energy efficiency, renewable energy, REDD+, and adaptation.
- Developing countries are increasingly establishing national funding entities to ensure climate projects are aligned with national priorities and to leverage existing funds and initiatives.
- While many developing countries have robust systems for general audit and oversight from previous experience with Official Development Assistance and FDI, they often lack the specific capacity to manage the intricacies of climate change financing.
- Brazil has implemented a hybrid model with the Amazon Fund, which is a "virtual institution" embedded within existing structures, and the National Fund on Climate Change, which uses oil revenues to combat climate effects.
- Indonesia's Climate Change Trust Fund (ICCTF) is designed to align climate action with the national development agenda, utilizing an interim fund manager (UNDP) to build national capacity.
- Ecuador established the Yasuni ITT Trust Fund to receive international contributions in exchange for its decision to permanently forego the extraction of 846 million barrels of oil from the Yasuni ITT fields.
- The Bangladesh Climate Change Resilience Fund (BCCRF) was established to support vulnerable communities in adapting to climate uncertainty, with a governance structure chaired by the government and including civil society.
- The document identifies several other emerging initiatives, including a proposed National Survival Fund in the Philippines for adaptation and a Green Bond being explored by Costa Rica.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Gomez-Echeverri, L. (2010). NATIONAL FUNDING ENTITIES. Climate Strategies. https://climatestrategies.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/ecbi-cs-national-funding-entities-draft-for-review.pdf
- Chicago
- Gomez-Echeverri, Luis. NATIONAL FUNDING ENTITIES. Climate Strategies, 2010. https://climatestrategies.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/ecbi-cs-national-funding-entities-draft-for-review.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=Gomez-Echeverri |first1=Luis |title=NATIONAL FUNDING ENTITIES |publisher=Climate Strategies |date=17 September 2010 |url=https://climatestrategies.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/ecbi-cs-national-funding-entities-draft-for-review.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{gomezecheverri2010national, author = {Gomez-Echeverri, Luis}, title = {{NATIONAL FUNDING ENTITIES}}, institution = {Climate Strategies}, year = {2010}, month = sep, url = {https://climatestrategies.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/ecbi-cs-national-funding-entities-draft-for-review.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated