Search Climate Insights Directory

The State Revolving Loan Funds (SRFs) operate as finance programs where federal grants are converted into loans for local utilities, which are then repaid and reinvested. The Clean Water SRF (CWSRF) and Drinking Water SRF (DWSRF) provide below-market interest rates (averaging 1.5%) and prioritize projects based on state-specific needs, including green infrastructure and disadvantaged communities. Since 1988, the CWSRF has facilitated over $172 billion in investment across 65,000 projects. The document highlights a critical funding gap, noting that the national need to maintain clean water infrastructure is at least $630.1 billion over the next twenty years.

The document outlines three federal financing options for rural electricity providers: the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Loan Program (EECLP), the Rural Economic Development Loan and Grant Program (REDLG), and the Rural Energy Savings Program (RESP). EECLP offers large-scale, non-competitive financing at Treasury rates for a wide range of efficiency and renewable energy projects. REDLG provides zero-interest loans or grants for projects creating rural employment, including energy efficiency, though it requires a 20% in-kind match. RESP is specifically designed for on-bill financing, offering zero-interest loans to providers who can re-lend to consumers at up to 3% interest, provided the energy measures have a payback period of 10 years or less.

This brochure describes the mission, vision, and value proposition of WIRES, an international non-profit trade association dedicated to promoting investment in the North American electric transmission system.

The 'Switch It Up!' program, launched in April 2019 by the Orcas Power and Light Cooperative (OPALCO), provides debt-free, on-bill financing for residential and commercial members to replace fossil-fuel equipment with electric alternatives. Funded initially by a $5.8 million USDA Rural Energy Savings Program (RESP) loan and later supplemented by an additional $15 million, the program covers air-source heat pumps, heat pump water heaters, and EV charging stations, with borrowing limits up to $36,000. Repayments are tied to the electric meter over up to 10 years at a 2% interest rate, removing barriers for low- and moderate-income households. In its first year, the program completed 96 projects totaling over $800,000, with plans to expand into rooftop solar, battery storage, and community solar projects.

The "Help My House" pilot program in South Carolina demonstrated that on-bill financing can effectively reduce energy costs for rural residents without upfront expenses. By providing low-cost loans repaid through electric bills, the program achieved a 34 percent reduction in energy use across 125 participating homes, saving an average of $288 per home annually after loan payments. The model aimed to avoid billions in new power plant capital costs and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by targeting inefficient older homes and low-income residents who lack access to conventional financing.

The document lists the professional backgrounds of various experts, policymakers, and industry leaders participating in the National Clean Fuels Technology & Health Effects Leadership Forum. The presenters include former diplomats, senators, CEOs of renewable fuel associations, and agricultural specialists, with a strong focus on ethanol, biofuels, and environmental legislation.

EESI urges the EPA to reject proposed reductions to the 2014-2016 Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) volumes, arguing that such cuts stifle investment in advanced and cellulosic biofuels. The document contends that the 'blend wall'—the limit of E10 ethanol in the fuel supply—is a result of oil industry restrictions rather than a lack of fuel supply. EESI proposes several solutions, including holding oil refineries accountable for infrastructure, approving mid-level ethanol blends (E25-E40) to reduce greenhouse gases and toxic aromatics, and restoring credits for FlexFuel Vehicles (FFVs). It further argues that the EPA's MOVES 2014 emissions model is flawed and that the agency should use the Clean Air Act to regulate toxic gasoline aromatics (BTEX) by promoting ethanol as a cleaner octane booster.

The document details cobalt's critical importance for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles and electronics, noting that demand for clean energy technologies is expected to rise by 80% between 2025 and 2030. It highlights a highly concentrated supply chain, with the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) producing about 76% of global cobalt and China refining 50% to 70% of global supplies. The text emphasizes severe externalities in the DRC, including child labor, human rights violations, and the deforestation of 32,100 acres of the Congo Basin forest from 2001 to 2020. It also notes the U.S. has a 76% import reliance for cobalt and discusses recycling and substitutes, such as iron-phosphate and TAQ, to mitigate supply and ethical risks.

Hudson River Sloop Clearwater opposes the transfer of Indian Point's nuclear licenses to Holtec International, citing the company's 'rip and ship' decommissioning model as a risk to public safety and a means to maximize private profit from ratepayer funds. The document details a pattern of bribery and fraud involving Holtec and its partner SNC-Lavalin, including a World Bank ban and criminal charges in Canada and Libya. It highlights safety failures at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, such as damaged canisters and a near-miss accident, and criticizes Holtec's proposed Consolidated Interim Storage facility in New Mexico for being located in an active oil field. The author contends that Holtec's lack of decommissioning experience and its complex LLC structure create a significant risk that taxpayers will be left with the costs of incomplete remediation.

The document details the essential role of critical minerals in clean energy technologies, the U.S.'s high import reliance, and the regulatory and economic barriers to domestic production. It highlights the environmental and human rights risks of mining, the potential for secondary recovery and recycling, and recent federal legislative and executive actions aimed at securing supply chains.

The research identifies 656 industrial facilities and 174 ethanol plants in the contiguous U.S. as primary opportunities for point-source carbon capture. It focuses exclusively on process emissions, excluding indirect emissions from the electrical grid and stationary combustion. The study employs a technology-agnostic cost model to estimate the cost of CO2 avoided, incorporating capture, compression, transport (via trucking or pipeline), and injection costs. Key sectors analyzed include cement, bioethanol, refining, hydrogen, and ammonia production, with a particular emphasis on the proximity of these facilities to sedimentary basins and existing CO2 pipelines to determine eligibility for the federal 45Q tax credit.

The report investigates 'beneficial electrification'—the replacement of fossil-fuel end-use equipment with electric alternatives to reduce carbon emissions and costs—within Midwest rural electric cooperatives. While 88% of these co-ops offer energy upgrade or loan programs, the research found no 'fully beneficial electrification program' in the Midwest that combines conversion incentives, a net carbon reduction goal, verification processes, and energy audits. The document highlights the potential of cold climate air-source heat pumps (ccHP) and heat pump water heaters to provide grid flexibility and member savings. It emphasizes 'equitable beneficial electrification' (EBE), advocating for inclusive on-bill financing that removes credit score barriers and attaches loans to the meter to support low-income members and renters. Case studies from cooperatives in Washington, Arkansas, North Carolina, and Minnesota illustrate various models of on-bill tariffs and community solar projects used to reduce energy burdens.