Search Climate Insights Directory

Search syntax
intitle:
The document title intitle:"climate education"
ispublisher:
The publishing organization ispublisher:CAPE
insummary:
Summary and key findings insummary:"conflict of interest"
hasconcept:
Climate tags, frame/perspective and analysis type hasconcept:"Climate Justice"
geography:
Regions the document covers or discusses geography:Canada
doctype:
Document type doctype:report
lang:
Document language, as an ISO code lang:fr
cidid:
One record, by its directory id cidid:iisd-000297
GeographyPlaquemine
Clear all

2 results

  • The WRAP (Waste Reduction Always Pays) program was implemented by Dow Chemical Company's Louisiana Division starting in 1987. Evolving from an energy-saving contest initiated in 1981 to address oil price shocks and capital scarcity, the program expanded to include yield improvement and waste reduction. The program's creation was influenced by a 1985 congressional survey on emissions, pressure from environmental groups, and the upcoming SARA Title III reporting requirements. Over time, the program's financial criteria shifted from requiring a 100% return on investment (ROI) to a 30% ROI, with a minimum savings threshold of $10,000 per project.

    AI-generated

    This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

    Document type: Case study

  • The WRAP program at Dow Chemical's Louisiana Division incentivized employees to propose waste reduction projects by linking environmental goals with financial returns. Starting as an energy contest in 1981, it evolved into a comprehensive waste reduction initiative by 1986, utilizing a competitive submission process and ROI-based justification. By 1992, the program achieved significant waste reductions and cost savings, fostering a corporate culture of pollution prevention through recognition and knowledge sharing.

    AI-generated

    This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

    Document type: Case study

Showing 1–2 of 2 documents