Search Climate Insights Directory

Search syntax
intitle:
The document title intitle:"climate education"
ispublisher:
The publishing organization ispublisher:CAPE
insummary:
Summary and key findings insummary:"conflict of interest"
hasconcept:
Climate tags, frame/perspective and analysis type hasconcept:"Climate Justice"
geography:
Regions the document covers or discusses geography:Canada
doctype:
Document type doctype:report
lang:
Document language, as an ISO code lang:fr
cidid:
One record, by its directory id cidid:iisd-000297
GeographyMunlochy
Clear all

2 results

  • The document outlines several objections to GM oilseed rape trials in Scotland, citing poor trial design, the risk of creating herbicide-resistant 'superweeds', and the potential for genetic contamination of non-GM crops. It highlights the dangers of the 'Liberty' herbicide (glufosinate), alleging it causes birth defects in animals and poses a threat to wildlife in Munlochy Bay. Additionally, the submission discusses risks to bees, including horizontal gene transfer and antibiotic resistance, and warns that the use of the cauliflower mosaic virus promoter could lead to new diseases. The authors conclude that the trials are flawed and the crops are economically and environmentally unviable.

    AI-generated

    This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

    Themes: biodiversity

    Document type: Statement

  • The report contends that genetically engineered (GM) crops, specifically Chardon LL, pose significant risks to human health, animal welfare, and the environment. It highlights the toxicity of the associated herbicide 'Liberty', criticizes the design of farm-scale trials and safety testing, and alleges systemic fraud and regulatory laxity in the UK and US. The authors argue that GM crops threaten biodiversity and soil carbon sequestration while primarily benefiting seed and chemical corporations.

    AI-generated

    This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Showing 1–2 of 2 documents