Search Climate Insights Directory

Federal fuel economy and vehicle emissions standards have saved Maine $190 million to date and are projected to make the average Maine household $2,950 richer by 2030. These standards reduce global warming emissions in Maine by an amount equivalent to twice those from providing electricity to Portland and are expected to create 2,900 new jobs in the state.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 benefit Maryland by reducing gasoline consumption, lowering household spending at the pump, and stimulating local economic growth and job creation.

The document argues that federal fuel economy and global warming emissions standards set by the EPA and NHTSA benefit Michigan through significant household savings, job creation, and emissions reductions. It highlights that by 2030, the average Michigan household is expected to be $2,150 richer due to gas savings outweighing the upfront cost of more efficient vehicles. To date, Michigan has saved $1.1 billion, and the standards are projected to create 28,200 new jobs in the state. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions in Michigan equivalent to twice those produced by providing electricity to Grand Rapids.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 provide significant financial and environmental advantages to Minnesota. By 2030, the average Minnesota household is projected to be $2,850 richer due to gas savings. To date, the state has saved $650 million, and the standards are expected to support 12,800 new jobs in the state. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions in Minnesota equivalent to three times those produced by providing electricity to Duluth.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 provide significant benefits to Mississippi, including fuel savings, job creation, and emissions reductions. It projects that by 2030, the average Mississippi household will be $3,150 richer due to gas savings outweighing the upfront cost of more efficient vehicles. To date, Mississippi has saved $350 million, and the state is expected to see 4,700 new jobs. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions in Mississippi equivalent to twice those produced by providing electricity to Jackson.

The document argues that federal fuel economy and global warming emissions standards provide significant financial and environmental advantages to Missouri. It highlights that the state has already saved $690 million and projects that the average Missouri household will be $2,600 richer by 2030 due to gas savings. Additionally, the standards are expected to create 13,500 new jobs in the state and eliminate emissions equivalent to more than those required to provide electricity to Springfield.

The document outlines the positive impacts of EPA and NHTSA light-duty vehicle standards on Montana, highlighting projected household savings of $2,500 by 2030 and the creation of 1,700 new jobs. It asserts that these standards reduce global warming emissions, lower fuel costs for consumers, and support the American auto industry by providing investment certainty for new technologies.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 provide significant financial and environmental advantages to Nevada. By 2030, the average Nevada household is projected to be $3,050 richer due to gas savings. To date, Nevada has saved $290 million, and the state can expect 5,000 new jobs. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions in Nevada equivalent to more than those generated by providing electricity to Reno.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 provide significant financial and environmental gains for New Hampshire. It claims that by 2030, the average New Hampshire household will be $2,500 richer due to gas savings, and the state will see 3,200 new jobs. Environmentally, the standards are credited with eliminating global warming emissions nearly equal to those generated by providing electricity to the entire state of New Hampshire.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA provide significant financial and environmental benefits to New Jersey, including $750 million in savings to date and the projected creation of 16,000 new jobs by 2030.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 provide significant financial and environmental advantages to New Mexico. By 2030, the average New Mexico household is projected to be $2,700 richer due to gas savings. To date, the state has saved $210 million, and the standards are expected to create 2,000 new jobs in the state. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions in New Mexico nearly equivalent to those generated by providing electricity to Albuquerque.

The document argues that federal fuel economy and emissions standards set by the EPA and NHTSA provide significant benefits to New York, including $1.8 billion in savings to date and projected household gains of $1,950 by 2030. It highlights that these standards reduce global warming emissions by an amount equivalent to the electricity needs of New York City and support job creation within the auto industry.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 benefit North Dakota by reducing fuel costs, creating jobs, and lowering emissions. It highlights that by 2030, the average North Dakota household will be $3,300 richer due to gas savings. To date, the state has saved $130 million, and the standards have eliminated emissions equivalent to the electricity needs of Bismarck.

Federal fuel economy and vehicle emissions standards have saved Ohio $1.2 billion to date and are projected to make the average Ohio household $2,200 richer by 2030. These standards are expected to create 29,700 new jobs in the state and eliminate global warming emissions nearly equivalent to those from providing electricity to Columbus.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 provide significant financial and environmental advantages to Rhode Island. It highlights that these standards reduce global warming emissions, lower fuel costs for households, and stimulate local economic growth and job creation.

The fact sheet details the positive impacts of EPA and NHTSA light-duty vehicle standards on South Carolina, highlighting fuel savings, job creation, and emissions reductions. It asserts that these standards increase household wealth and support the auto industry by providing investment certainty.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA benefit Tennessee by reducing fuel costs, creating jobs, and lowering emissions. It projects that by 2030, the average Tennessee household will be $3,150 richer due to gas savings and that the state has already saved $800 million. Nationally, these standards are credited with increasing GDP by up to $30 billion and creating 650,000 full-time jobs by 2030.

The document asserts that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 benefit Texas through fuel savings, job creation, and emissions reductions. By 2030, the average Texas household is projected to be $3,250 richer due to gas savings outweighing the upfront cost of more efficient vehicles. To date, Texas has saved $3 billion, and the standards are expected to create 24,400 new jobs in the state. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions in Texas nearly equivalent to those generated by providing electricity to Houston.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA benefit Vermont by reducing gasoline consumption, lowering household spending at the pump, and stimulating economic growth. It highlights that by 2030, the average Vermont household will save $2,850, and the state has already saved $80 million to date.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA provide significant financial savings, job growth, and emissions reductions for Virginia, warning that rolling back these protections would jeopardize this progress.