Search Climate Insights Directory

The report examines the widespread use of glyphosate, noting a nearly 15-fold increase in global use since 1996 due to genetically modified crops. It details the emergence of glyphosate-resistant weeds and the contamination of surface and groundwater in Europe and North America. The document highlights scientific disputes over chronic toxicity, including carcinogenicity, and criticizes the Canadian Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) for its 2017 re-evaluation decision, which critics argue relied on outdated, non-peer-reviewed industry data.

The document argues that the PMRA has failed to meet legal requirements under the Pest Control Products Act (PCPA) to assess cumulative pesticide risks since 2006. While welcoming the proposed framework, the signatories recommend that cumulative assessments be integrated into individual pesticide registration and re-evaluation decisions, rather than occurring after them. They call for a precautionary approach to grouping pesticides by common mechanisms of toxicity, the inclusion of epidemiological data for outcomes like cancer and endocrine disruption, and the expansion of the framework to cover cumulative environmental risks. Additionally, the authors contest the PMRA's characterization of the 'PCPA factor' as a policy rather than a scientific uncertainty factor and urge for improved monitoring of human and environmental pesticide exposures.

The UNEP Financial Inquiry argues that while global financial assets are abundant, investment flows are misaligned with sustainable development due to systemic failures and ineffective pricing. It identifies five key financial areas for alignment—banking, bonds, institutional investment, central banks, and systemic risk assessment—and proposes a performance framework based on effectiveness, efficiency, and resilience to measure the scaling of sustainable finance.

The document argues that the IFC's 'lessons learned' process is insufficient because it ignores institutional culture, fails to address the systemic miscategorisation of project risks, and lacks a formal implementation and monitoring framework. While acknowledging some positive steps, the authors highlight ongoing failures in projects across Honduras, Burma, Indonesia, and Nicaragua, and call for a time-bound plan to integrate human rights assessments and poverty reduction goals into IFC operations.

The World Wide Fund for Nature South Africa (WWF-SA), represented by the Centre for Environmental Rights (CER), filed an internal appeal to the Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) on 26 July 2013. The appeal challenges the DMR's refusal to grant access to records regarding seabed prospecting rights and strategies in South Africa's territorial waters and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), which the DMR claimed would substantially and unreasonably divert its resources.

The document argues that the IFC's draft Sustainability Framework fails to adequately protect human rights, noting that references to human rights were removed from previous drafts. The signatories call for mandatory human rights due diligence for both the IFC and its clients, alignment with the UN 'Protect, Respect and Remedy' framework, and specific safeguards regarding water rights, gender impacts, forced evictions, and environmental damage.

The document analyzes China's 'going-out' strategy, noting that while overseas FDI grew rapidly, it remained concentrated in energy and mining sectors and faced significant losses. It identifies four primary risk categories: breach of contract, exchange losses, premium-value transactions, and integration failures. The author argues that systemic risks stem from excessive government intervention and a lack of international management capacity, while external risks are primarily driven by the incompatibility of legal, political, and social institutions between China and host countries.

The report analyzes the EPA's 2007 risk assessment, finding that unlined coal ash ponds and landfills pose severe cancer and non-cancer risks to humans and aquatic ecosystems. It specifically highlights that residents near unlined ponds mixing ash and coal refuse face a 1 in 50 cancer risk from arsenic, 2,000 times the EPA's regulatory goal. The document also notes that boron levels in surface waters can reach 2,000 times safe thresholds for aquatic life. It argues that the EPA underestimated these risks by ignoring direct surface water releases and inhalation pathways, and calls for the phase-out of ash ponds within five years and the mandatory use of composite liners for landfills.

The document argues that the PS/EPs fail to provide a robust framework for managing human rights risks, citing substantial gaps in substantive standards, due diligence procedures, and grievance mechanisms. Through a review of 61 project cases and an analysis using the Danish Institute for Human Rights' tool, the authors conclude that the PS/EPs do not align with international human rights norms and require significant amendment to ensure project sponsors meet their baseline responsibility to respect human rights.

The report investigates stewardship planning for the Saskatchewan government, focusing on two modes of influence: internal operations (e.g., green procurement, energy use) and external influence (e.g., legislation and policy). It analyzes case studies from the United Kingdom, Canada, Manitoba, and Oregon, as well as corporate reporting frameworks like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and PotashCorp. Key findings emphasize the need to integrate stewardship planning with existing budgeting and accountability frameworks to ensure effectiveness and organizational capacity.

The document provides technical and legal arguments to support the position that 'insufficient scientific evidence' under the SPS Agreement should be interpreted to include cases of high scientific uncertainty. It details the unpredictable nature of rDNA techniques, the lack of independent peer-reviewed data, and the potential for unintended toxic or environmental effects, asserting that these factors prevent adequate risk assessments and justify precautionary regulatory measures.

The document details coal ash generation in Kansas, which ranks 29th in the U.S. with 1.3 million tons produced annually. It identifies 13 coal ash ponds across six plants, noting that all are over 20 years old and one is rated as a "significant hazard." The report highlights a lack of liners and leachate collection systems at several sites, including the Holcomb power station landfill, and notes specific releases at the LaCygne Generating Station due to rainfall.

The document details the disposal of 2.1 million tons of annual coal ash in Wyoming, highlighting that 17 ponds across five plants exist, with three rated as "significant hazard." It notes that 11 ponds are over 30 years old and identifies specific historical releases and groundwater contamination issues at sites like the Naughton, Dave Johnston, and Jim Bridger power stations.

The document presents the 'Seven Questions to Sustainability' framework, developed by MMSD North America to evaluate the long-term sustainability of mining and minerals projects. The framework covers engagement, people, environment, economy, traditional activities, governance, and synthesis. It is intended for use across all project phases—from exploration to post-closure—to aid in appraisal, planning, financing, and reporting for stakeholders including industry, governments, and indigenous groups.

The document examines next-generation geothermal technologies—including enhanced geothermal systems, closed-loop, and superhot systems—which differ from conventional methods by drilling into hot rocks lacking natural fluid or permeability. While these technologies offer potential for 24/7 clean electricity globally and in the United States, their commercialization requires cost reductions, the mitigation of environmental risks, and the resolution of financing and permitting barriers.

The document outlines the difficulties financial institutions face when assessing the materiality of environmental trends in South and Southeast Asia, specifically regarding data availability, contextual analysis, and predictability.

The document examines the consequences of environmental and social risk management in overseas investments through six case studies of multinational companies. It argues that strong risk management benefits companies, while failure leads to financial loss and reputational damage. It provides specific strategic advice for Chinese companies to mitigate these risks by adhering to host country laws, understanding local cultures, engaging stakeholders, and adopting international best practices. Additionally, it offers policy recommendations for the Chinese government, financial institutions, NGOs, and media to improve the oversight and impact of China's outward foreign direct investment.