Search Climate Insights Directory

The 2024 IPIE expert survey of 412 researchers across 66 countries indicates a growing pessimism about the global information environment, with 63% expecting it to worsen. Experts identify social media platform owners and governments as the primary threats. While generative AI is viewed as a tool for improving journalism and content detection, there is significant concern regarding its role in amplifying harassment, bias, and misinformation. The report emphasizes the necessity of supporting independent media and improving data access for interdisciplinary research.

The document examines how AI technologies—specifically generative AI, large language models (LLMs), and recommender systems—can be exploited to scale disinformation, impersonate individuals via deepfakes, and automate political micro-targeting. It contrasts these risks with AI's potential to detect harmful content and enhance counter-speech. The briefing also reviews emerging regulatory frameworks in the EU, UK, and US, and discusses ethical principles like accountability and 'Constitutional AI' as means to govern these technologies.

The report analyzes the spread of misinformation during the 2023 Canadian wildfires, noting a surge in arson and government-conspiracy narratives driven by right-wing/anti-establishment networks. It identifies a trend where pandemic-era distrust of public health measures has transitioned into opposition to climate and energy policies. The study also examines the 2024 German farmer protests, finding that Canadian right-wing influencers leveraged these events to frame climate policy as a tool for globalist control, though such efforts had limited traction among the broader Canadian public.

The 2024 IPIE expert survey of 412 researchers across 66 countries identifies the availability of accurate information and diversity of voices as the primary features of a healthy information environment. Social media platform owners, governments, and politicians are cited as the most significant threats. While generative AI is viewed as a tool that could potentially improve content detection and journalism, 63% of experts express significant concern regarding its potential to amplify misinformation, harassment, and bias. Experts in developing countries report higher levels of concern regarding AI and platform-based threats but show greater optimism toward interventions like fact-checking and media literacy.

The 2024 IPIE expert survey of 412 researchers across 66 countries identifies the availability of accurate information and diversity of voices as essential for a healthy information environment. Social media platform owners and politicians are viewed as the primary threats. While generative AI is seen as a risk—particularly regarding AI-generated videos—there is moderate hope for its use in content detection and journalistic support. Experts generally predict the information environment will worsen in 2025, emphasizing the need for more research outside the USA and Western democracies.

The IPIE submission argues for the reduction of bureaucratic barriers and the strengthening of researcher rights under the Digital Services Act's data access framework. Based on a survey of scientific affiliates, the document identifies risks such as political capture of Digital Services Coordinators (DSCs), lack of transparency in data inventories, and restrictive interpretations of 'other sources' of data. Key recommendations include the implementation of a fast-track process for time-sensitive data, mandatory researcher participation in dispute settlements, and the requirement for DSCs to use English as a mandatory communication language to ensure cross-border scientific coordination.

The International Panel on the Information Environment (IPIE) submits recommendations to the OECD to strengthen information integrity. Key proposals include requiring online platforms to grant independent researchers access to data and systems, promoting innovative funding for independent media to ensure diversity of ownership, and implementing more stringent industry standards for the provenance of generative AI content. The IPIE also suggests that governments take enforcement actions and impose sanctions when disinformation poses significant risks to human rights and democratic processes, while advising the removal of language focusing on 'malicious intent' due to the difficulty of proof.

The 2024 IPIE expert survey reveals a growing pessimism about the global information environment, with 63% of experts expecting it to deteriorate. The availability of accurate information and diversity of voices are identified as the most critical characteristics of a healthy information environment. Social media platform owners, governments, and politicians are cited as the primary threats. While generative AI is viewed as a tool that could improve content detection and journalism, experts are more concerned about its potential to amplify disinformation, harassment, and bias.

The 2024 IPIE expert survey reveals a growing pessimism about the global information environment, with 63% of experts expecting it to worsen. The availability of accurate information and diversity of voices are identified as the most critical characteristics of a healthy environment. Social media platform owners, governments, and politicians are cited as the primary threats. While generative AI is viewed as a tool that could improve content detection and journalism, experts are predominantly concerned that it will amplify disinformation, harassment, and bias. Experts advocate for supporting free and independent media and digital media literacy to build resilience.

The 2024 IPIE expert survey reveals a growing pessimism about the global information environment, with 63% of respondents expecting conditions to worsen. Experts identify the availability of accurate information and diversity of opinion as the most critical characteristics of a healthy environment, while naming social media owners, governments, and politicians as the primary threats. Generative AI is viewed with mixed sentiment: 63% of experts believe it has negatively impacted the environment by scaling disinformation and bias, though 67% hope it will improve content detection and journalistic efficiency. To improve the environment, experts advocate for free and independent media and increased digital media literacy.

The 2024 IPIE expert survey indicates a growing pessimism about the global information landscape, with 63% of respondents expecting it to deteriorate. Experts identify the availability of reliable information and diversity of voices as essential for a healthy landscape, while naming social media platform owners and governments as the primary threats. Generative AI is viewed with mixed sentiment: while 67% hope it can improve content detection and journalism, 63% fear it will amplify biases, harassment, and misinformation. The report calls for support of independent media and improved data access for cross-platform, multidisciplinary research.

The 2024 IPIE expert survey reveals a growing pessimism about the global information environment, with 63% of respondents expecting it to worsen. Experts identify the availability of accurate information and diversity of voices as the most critical features of a healthy environment, while naming social media platform owners and governments as the primary threats. Generative AI is viewed as a double-edged sword: 63% of experts fear it will amplify bias and misinformation, although 67% see potential for improving content discovery and journalism. The report emphasizes the need for supporting independent media and overcoming data access barriers for researchers.

The 2024 IPIE expert consultation reveals a growing pessimism about the global information environment, with 63% of researchers expecting it to worsen. Experts identify the availability of accurate information and diversity of voices as the most critical characteristics of a healthy information environment. The owners of social media platforms, governments, and politicians are cited as the most significant threats. Generative AI is viewed with mixed sentiment: while 63% of experts fear it will amplify disinformation, harassment, and bias, 67% hope it will improve content detection and journalism. Experts advocate for free and independent media, digital literacy, and improved data access for multi-disciplinary research.

The 2024 IPIE expert survey reveals a growing pessimism about the global information environment, with 63% of respondents expecting it to worsen. Experts identify access to accurate information and diverse voices as critical for a healthy environment, while viewing social media owners, governments, and politicians as the primary threats. Generative AI is viewed with mixed sentiment: 63% fear it will increase bias and misinformation, while 67% hope it will improve content discovery and journalism. The report advocates for supporting independent media and improving data access for researchers.

The document argues that traditional, securitised responses to violent extremism are inadequate for the current 'post-organisational' threat environment, which is characterised by ideological hybridisation, transnational networks, and algorithmic amplification. It advocates for a 'public health approach' that targets underlying vulnerabilities through four tiers of prevention: primordial, primary, secondary, and tertiary. The playbook details 'tried and tested' models—such as digital citizenship education, counternarratives, and direct engagement—alongside innovative strategies including 'inoculation' (pre-bunking), real-time correction of narratives, and the disruption of extremist ecosystems. It concludes with practical guidance on monitoring, evaluation, safeguarding, and operational security for practitioners.

The report identifies a growing network of far-right actors, conspiracy theorists, and COVID-19 sceptics in France who are targeting all-ages drag events through online harassment and increasing in-person protests. It highlights the influence of US-based anti-drag narratives and the role of political parties like Reconquête and Rassemblement National in these efforts.

The report analyzes the Irish Channel's role in spreading misinformation, specifically regarding election interference and immigration. It details the site's connection to the Irish Freedom Party and its operation as part of the Premier Content Network, a content aggregation system. The analysis also suggests the use of generative AI to produce articles containing factual errors and fabricated citations.

The document is a comprehensive guide designed to help individuals and groups identify, monitor, and act against technology-facilitated gender-based violence (TFGBV). It defines various forms of digital abuse, analyzes the current media landscape, and provides a detailed manual for manual social media monitoring to identify misogyny that AI algorithms often miss. The toolkit also includes a strategic action plan model and a code of conduct for safe meeting environments.

The World Association for Christian Communication (WACC) highlights a global decline in peaceful coexistence and media trust, exacerbated by the climate crisis, economic instability, and conflict. The organization advocates for 'communicative justice, digital justice and gender justice' to ensure marginalized communities are seen and heard.

The WACC President, Embert Charles, highlights a global rise in disinformation, media restrictions, and attacks on journalists, specifically noting situations in Haiti, Ukraine, and Gaza. He argues that economic crises, the climate crisis, and armed conflicts have undermined peaceful coexistence and public trust in media. To address these challenges, the WACC aims to promote communicative, digital, and gender justice to ensure communities can express their needs and hopes for a better world.