Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Iowa, stating that specific policies could save residents over $7 billion on utility bills and avoid 9 million tons of CO2 by 2030.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Illinois, asserting that specific policies can help the state meet 83% of its carbon reduction goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan. It projects that by 2030, a combination of 1.5% annual energy savings, national model building codes, and 500 MWs of new combined heat and power would avoid over 29 million tons of CO2 and save Illinoisans $5.4 billion.

Indiana can achieve significant environmental and economic gains by adopting energy efficiency policies. By 2030, a combination of 1% annual energy savings, national model building codes, and 100 MWs of new combined heat and power could avoid over 15 million tons of CO2 and save residents nearly $3 billion.

The fact sheet outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Kansas, highlighting its role in meeting the EPA's Clean Power Plan and reducing public health risks from air pollution.

The fact sheet outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Kentucky, stating that specific policies could save the state $1.6 billion and avoid 12 million tons of CO2 by 2030. It emphasizes that these measures would help Kentucky meet 43% of its carbon pollution reduction goal under the EPA's Clean Power Plan and significantly reduce nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide emissions.

The fact sheet outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Louisiana, specifically highlighting how policies like energy service contracts and building codes can reduce carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and sulfur dioxide emissions by 2030. It asserts that these measures would save Louisianans $1 billion and significantly contribute to meeting the EPA's Clean Power Plan goals.

The fact sheet outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Michigan, highlighting its role in meeting federal air regulations and reducing utility costs. It cites a Michigan Public Service Commission analysis showing a return of $4.38 in utility savings for every $1 spent on efficiency programs. The document projects that by 2030, a combination of 1.5% annual energy savings, national model building codes, and 500 MWs of new combined heat and power could save Michigan $5.5 billion and avoid over 21 million tons of carbon dioxide.

The document outlines the environmental and economic benefits of energy efficiency in Minnesota, asserting that such measures can help the state comply with the EPA's Clean Power Plan and save residents money.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Missouri, stating that specific policies could save residents $1.4 billion and significantly reduce carbon and air pollutants by 2030.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Mississippi, asserting that specific policies could save the state $873 million and avoid 2.6 million tons of CO2 by 2030.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Montana, specifically highlighting how targeted policies could save $84 million and avoid 1.4 million tons of CO2 by 2030.

The document outlines the environmental and economic benefits of energy efficiency in North Carolina, specifically highlighting how targeted policies can help the state meet federal air regulations and save residents money.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in North Dakota, asserting that such measures can reduce carbon pollution, save residents money, and improve public health. It specifically highlights the potential for North Dakota to meet over 20% of its carbon reduction goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan through popular efficiency policies.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Nebraska, asserting that such policies can help the state meet approximately 50% of its carbon pollution reduction goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan. It projects that by 2030, a combination of 1% annual energy savings, national model building codes, and 40 MWs of new combined heat and power could avoid over 4 million tons of CO2 and save Nebraskans more than $382 million.

The fact sheet outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in New Mexico, stating that specific policies could save residents $645 million and avoid 3.8 million tons of CO2 by 2030.

The fact sheet outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Ohio, asserting that specific policies could help the state meet 78% of its carbon pollution goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan and save residents $7.4 billion by 2030.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in Oklahoma, stating that specific policies could help the state meet 87% of its carbon pollution goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan. By 2030, a combination of annual energy savings, model building codes, energy service contracts, and 40 MWs of combined heat and power could avoid over 10 million tons of CO2 and save Oklahomans $288 million.

The fact sheet outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency policies in Pennsylvania, asserting that such measures can help the state meet a significant portion of its carbon reduction goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan while saving residents billions of dollars by 2030.

The document outlines the economic and environmental benefits of energy efficiency in South Carolina, asserting that specific policies could help the state meet nearly half of its carbon pollution goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan. It highlights that combining private sector energy service contracts, national model building codes, and 100 MWs of new combined heat and power could avoid over 4.8 million tons of CO2 by 2030 and save residents $1.2 billion by the same date.

The fact sheet outlines the potential environmental and economic benefits of energy efficiency in South Dakota, asserting that specific policies could help the state meet its carbon reduction goals under the EPA's Clean Power Plan while saving residents money.